Are you ashamed of the biased presidential coverage?

Um, that's the same story I linked to in the post that started this thread.

 

Malone is dead on in his analysis. Even in a shrinking industry one of the things print media still had going for it was its integrity.

Sadly in this election cycle much of that well earned integrity is gone.

 

That probably got lost in the barrage of liberal spew thrown your direction as soon as you started the thread.

Don't take it personally, SF Express is the board's voice of reason on most topics.

 

Well, um, see ... it was such an excellent post, I thought it beared repeating.

Sorry about that

 

Don't apologize... I never would have read it otherwise...

 

So, there's a history in this country of lynchings of white women guilty of being ... white women? Ah, I get your point. Right on target.

 

That technology writer provided analysis with the depth of a puddle.

At least the Politico guys try to go deeper than their big toe ...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14982.html

 

The ABC News guy evidently missed the primaries. Must have been blogging for Forbes or the WSJ, two bastions of the liberal media.

 

some of these responses make me ashamed.

the Malone column was dead on, but don't be silly and think anything will change.

 

There have been two cases of Obama being hung in effigy. None of your exaggerated expectations of the reactions came true. Next.

 

give me a break.

and they were immediately taken down. one in Oregon wasn't seen by anyone but a janitor.

 

What? We were told that if Obama were to be hung in effigy, riots would ensue. Are you telling me that because people didn't see the effigies in person, only heard about them through the news, that makes a difference?