1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Baltimore

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by YankeeFan, Apr 27, 2015.

  1. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Unless the source gives it to them in a parking garage late at night.
     
  2. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    Step 1: Blame the media
    Step 2: .....
     
  3. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    A big part of what any news organization does is decide what NOT to publish.
     
  4. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Every situation is exactly the same as every other situation.
     
  5. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    At least she's finally taking a hard stance on something. It's the wrong thing, but it's something. For most of the week she's sounded like she was in a medically-induced coma.
     
    YankeeFan and Mr. Sunshine like this.
  6. Mr. Sunshine

    Mr. Sunshine Well-Known Member

    Benghazi, Baltimore, what's the difference?
     
  7. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    Wait, so all this was really in response to an anti-African American video?
     
    Mr. Sunshine likes this.
  8. franticscribe

    franticscribe Well-Known Member

    Your point of clarification is in fact a point of confusion. The officer files his own affidavit for probable cause about what he has learned in the investigation and discloses to the court his reasons for believing he has met the standard necessary for a warrant. It is the officer swearing to the truth of his investigation, not the prisoner.

    Whether or not the officer misrepresented the prisoner's statement is well worth continued investigation by the media, but that does not mean the Post should sit on this - a court document outlining a significant part of the state's investigation - just because some people might question the prisoner's version. The Post did what it was required to do, ethically, which was verify the authenticity of the document and attempt to contact those whose words are represented in it.

    Legally the Post is fine. Ethically the Post is fine.
     
  9. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    Step 3: Profits!
     
    Spartan Squad and doctorquant like this.
  10. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    More absurd drivel from a guy named John T. Reed on Facebook.

    I can't for the life of me understand how or why somebody would or could try to hurt themselves that severely in Gray's situation.
    The "Hurt yourself so you can claim police brutality" is total bullcrap that does not happen and even if it did, nobody doing it would hurt themselves that badly.
    And I'm pretty sure the President made it very clear he did not condone the riots.
     
  11. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

  12. Mr. Sunshine

    Mr. Sunshine Well-Known Member

    Gonna be awkward when all the reporters vote to re-elect Rawlings-Blake.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page