1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Baseball Hall of Fame ballot released

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Hank_Scorpio, Nov 27, 2009.

  1. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    It's the longevity vs. dominance debate. Blyleven was consistently very good. Morris was the best pitcher in the game for about a decade. It's a valid argument.
     
  2. nmmetsfan

    nmmetsfan Active Member

    That's not a bad point. My only argument to that is two wrongs don't make a right. Besides, if you've voted that way for 30 years, and over those 30 years other writers vote players in that you thought were marginal, does that mean you have to change your criteria? I can't answer that question, since it wasn't my vote.
     
  3. I know people make this argument a lot, but I think it's a faulty one. A voter is in charge of his or her vote, not the votes in the past. So a voter with a ballot in hand today shouldn't have to worry about who's already in. It's not hypocritical to avoid voting for someone you think is subpar because there are already supposedly subpar players in the Hall. You can control only your vote.
     
  4. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I love the "If you have to think about it, then they don't deserve to make it."

    I think that's true about 95 percent of the time.
     
  5. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Blyleven was much more dominant over his best stretch than Morris ever was in his. This isn't fucking hard, Mizzou.
     
  6. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Please tell me which ten years he was the best pitcher in baseball.
     
  7. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    Bullshit. Not even close.
     
  8. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    No, he was the pitcher with the most wins in the decade. I'm not sure there was ever even one year that he was the best pitcher in the game. The guy led his league in victories twice and was never better than fifth in ERA for any one season. Morris never had an ERA under 3.00 for a single season. His best was 3.05.

    Blyleven had an ERA below 3.00 nine times.
     
  9. Machine Head

    Machine Head Well-Known Member

    60 shutouts.

    http://www.startribune.com/sports/twins/80755642.html?elr=KArksi8cyaiUqCP:iUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr
     
  10. Herbert Anchovy

    Herbert Anchovy Active Member

    Dawson: 49 HR, 32 BB in 1987. That's some surplus.
     
  11. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    Recapping:
    Travis Jackson was a veterrans' committee choie. Rabbit Maranville (who has no right being in) was elected in 1954. Pretty sure most of those voters are now dead.

    If so, no Blyleven, no Dawson, no Rice etc., etc.


    I never said Randy Jiohnson wasn't a lock first-ball Hall of Famer. What I sdaid was a lot of people here want to tell everybduy how to vote or take their vote away. Preposterous.
     
  12. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Here, Mizzou, I'll make it really easy for you.

    Here's Morris:

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/morrija02.shtml?redir

    Here's Blyleven:

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/blylebe01.shtml?redir

    I'll take Blyleven's first eight seasons. You can pick Morris' eight best. Show me how Morris compares. And keep in mind, I love Jack Morris. He pitched the greatest game I have ever seen. But someone once said Jack Morris was the best pitcher of the decade, and all of a sudden, people start remembering shit that didn't happen.

    You cannot vote for Morris and not vote for Blyleven. Blyleven was better at his best, and better for longer. Full stop.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page