1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

BCS leagues expanding - yeah?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Apr 19, 2010.

  1. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Big 12 had a $20 million exit fee. Mizzou, Texas A&M, Colorado and Nebraska all settled for somewhere around $10 million, or half the conference's asking price. No one's ever paid full price when it comes to exit fees during conference realignment. I'm sure the same would hold true with Maryland, Florida State and any other ACC team -- they won't be paying $50 million. Maybe $25 million, given recent history in other conferences.

    Also, when it comes to the Terps, would the guy who runs Under Armor be able to front some money to cover the costs? I'm guessing Under Armor would help the Terps move by paying some of the exit fee, whatever it may be.
     
  2. franticscribe

    franticscribe Well-Known Member

    Maryland doesn't have $25 million or $20 million, unless Under Armour is covering. The athletic department has been running in the red for years and has some insane debt obligation.
     
  3. Jake_Taylor

    Jake_Taylor Well-Known Member

    I bet Under Armour is more likely to foot the attorney bill when UMD claims the exit fee is illegal.
     
  4. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    That's a hell of a legal gamble to take with taxpayer money at stake. And the Big Ten is blinder than a syphillus victim if it can't see Rutgers is dead weight.
     
  5. Big Circus

    Big Circus Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]

    EDIT: Oh, SCREW you, Jake!
     
  6. Jake_Taylor

    Jake_Taylor Well-Known Member

    If I'm London or Edsall and Notre Dame is already plucking a bunch of recruits out of my backyard then the ACC office says "So we've got this deal on the table that will make it even easier for the Irish to recruit ACC territory and they might be able to leapfrog you in the bowl selection process, but you could get a home game against them every decade or so," it wouldn't be my favorite idea.

    But how about this Circus? Dennis Dodd says the Big 10 end game might include trying to woo UNC. If the Big 10 is planning to go to 16 then maybe UVa is another AAU school on the Big 10's list. There aren't too many out there that offer any more than the Hoos.
     
  7. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    Seems like this is more about expanding into TV markets. That the Big Ten wants DC, Baltimore, and NYC. If academics was the main reason, then maybe UVA or UNC get an invite, too. But no way UNC wags the dog that is the ACC going back to 1953, and then leaves the conference. I can't see it happening. However, oddly enough, Georgia Tech is another name being bandied about, apparently.

    But if Maryland and Florida State leave the ACC, much less Georgia Tech too, is the ACC the new Big East?


    And oh, wow! Check out this twitter feed... which I'm guessing is hacked, but damn.

    https://twitter.com/UofMaryland
     
  8. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    I got news for some of these people who think mediocre college football programs in large metro pro team areas move the TV ratings needle in those areas. Maryland doesn't come close to touching the Redskins, Ravens, Nationals or Orioles. Rutgers is less than a drop in the New York ratings bucket. These conferences are fools if they think TV will make a difference.
     
  9. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    I tend to agree with that. This is football-crazy country out here -- pro football. Virtually no one gives a rip about the Saturday games. And the Friday games.
     
  10. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    I don't disagree with that, either. But there's a lot of money to be made by simply having Big Ten Network subscribers in those markets.
     
  11. crimsonace

    crimsonace Well-Known Member

    It's not about ratings. It's about the $1/month BTN can demand from every cable subscriber in those markets from being placed on basic cable as it's now "home market." This expansion is all about more subscriber fees for BTN. NYC/DC would probably be worth a couple million a month in subscriber fees alone.
     
  12. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page