1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

BCS leagues expanding - yeah?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Apr 19, 2010.

  1. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

  2. Sam Mills 51

    Sam Mills 51 Well-Known Member

    The Metroplex.

    Not sure I agree with needing it – and thank goodness Jim Phillips is not the blatant media market whore that John Swofford was – but it's obvious that the ACC is hoping the three schools will add the Metroplex and Bay Area markets and will take the peanuts offered. The ACC is offering a weak olive branch of reduced revenue.

    That is, if at least one of NCSU, Chapel Hill, Clemson and Florida State will budge.

    The new joke: The Pony Express ... Legend of the ACC ...
     
  3. Big Circus

    Big Circus Well-Known Member

    2muchcoffeeman and Liut like this.
  4. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    They'll expand Gerald Ford if anything. Over the last quarter century, the trend has been to move OUT of the big NFL stadium, with Houston, Minnesota, UCF, Tulane, TCU and now Northwestern opting to either stay on campus or move back on campus. And rumor has it Pitt is exploring moving out of Heinz Field when the lease expires in seven years.
     
  5. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    My impression is that SMU is to DFW as Rutgers is to NYC: they're there, but not too many people really care. However it does provide rationalization that it "gets the conference in the market."
     
    dixiehack likes this.
  6. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    https://www.si.com/college/2023/08/24/acc-additions-stanford-cal-smu-progressing-vote-tv-deal


    "The ACC stands to earn over $70 million in additional revenue from ESPN by adding the three schools, money that kicks in automatically due to pro-rata increases already agreed to in the network’s contract with the league, according to a person familiar with the figures. How that amount is distributed has been the main sticking point throughout, and the focus of much of the recent conversations.

    Stanford and Cal would come in earning a reduced share of the ACC’s annual roughly $35-40 million average total distribution—perhaps as little as 25% initially, according to sources—escalating over multiple years, according to a source. SMU, according to sources, would forego their share of the media distribution portion of that pot for multiple years and essentially come into the league earning only from non-media rights distributions such as bowl distribution payouts, College Football Playoff distributions and NCAA tournament units. The money all three new entrants would be forfeiting would then go into a pool to be doled out as part of a so-called “success initiative” that will distribute payouts to all ACC schools based on teams’ performance in postseason play in revenue sports.

    For Stanford and Cal, the move to the ACC would provide a suitable home for many of their high level Olympic sports. There was significant concern about the competition level in the American Athletic Conference and Mountain West. For the ACC, this could be viewed as less about adding Stanford and Cal as it is buying Clemson and Florida State, both of which have been saber rattling privately and publicly about how far behind they’ve fallen off their in-state peers in other leagues.

    For ESPN, this lets the network add West Coast inventory in late-night East Coast time slots, which it lacked thanks to the dissolution of the Pac-12. Oregon and Washington went to the Big Ten, which has a media deal with Fox, NBC, and CBS. Utah, BYU, Arizona, Arizona State and Colorado’s Big 12 move would give ESPN some inventory, but they share rights with Fox. ESPN is the ACC’s sole media partner and operates the conference’s television network. "
     
  7. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    So, the ACC could have been proactive and added teams last year, triggering more cash from the network and decided, "naaaaah."

    Simply traded the Big East for a Baptist version of the Big East.
     
  8. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    Northwestern has always played on-campus.
     
  9. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    I should have phrased that better. I meant that Northwestern has drawn up plans to knock down Ryan Field and build a new one rather than relocate.
     
  10. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Last edited: Aug 27, 2023
  11. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    They'd think they were very happy to get into the conference, same as they do today.
     
  12. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Just rip the Band-Aid off already and break off P5 football. Never was in favor of it, but this latest game of musical chairs changed my mind.
     
    HanSenSE likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page