1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bonafide Baseball Hall of Famers

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Drip, Jul 24, 2009.

  1. ArnoldBabar

    ArnoldBabar Active Member

    But 11 of the 226 people doing the voting didn't vote for him.
     
  2. ArnoldBabar

    ArnoldBabar Active Member

    Are you saying Jesus was on steroids?
     
  3. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    So we need to forgive the players who juiced, how the hell else were they supposed to compete.
     
  4. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    Yeah, but you mistyped and said he didn't make it on the first ballot, when actually he was on the FIRST ballot. I know what you meant to say, though.
     
  5. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Maybe. How do we know steroids didn't exist back then? [/Jeff Kent]
     
  6. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    Maybe. Given his water-into-wine powers, how could he ever take a legitimate urine test?
     
  7. ArnoldBabar

    ArnoldBabar Active Member

    Yeah, sorry, I meant those people weren't unanimous.
     
  8. cyclingwriter

    cyclingwriter Active Member

    It's taken this long for someone to reference Major League? Ok, I'll do it. "You're trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?"
     
  9. Birdscribe

    Birdscribe Active Member

    He got outpolled by Ty Cobb, who also wasn't unanimous.

    The two most dominant players of the first half of the 20th century and neither were unanimous. And Cy "511 Victories" Young had to wait a year before HE got in.

    Enough said on this front.

    Beat me to it, Cycling. Well played.
     
  10. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Just because 11 people found some stupid reason not to vote for Babe Ruth does not mean it is appropriate for a modern voter to refuse to vote for a guy he KNOWS is a Hall of Famer just to keep him from being unanimous.
     
  11. Birdscribe

    Birdscribe Active Member

    Oh, I agree OOP. I was just stating the facts.

    That Rickey Henderson, Tom Seaver and Cal Ripken -- just to pull three no-brainers from our era -- weren't unanimous says more about the idiocy of voters than it does about their qualifications.
     
  12. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Gotcha. And yes, it does.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page