1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Braves ditching The Ted for suburbs

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by rico_the_redneck, Nov 11, 2013.

  1. Lugnuts

    Lugnuts Well-Known Member

    Oh fuck - I'm hearing it's awesome.

    And the little stinkers just won again.

    Um... Go Braves ??? :D
     
    Donny in his element and TyWebb like this.
  2. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    Wait... You hear it's a really cool place with a good fan experience, and that's a BAD thing?
     
  3. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Nah. That stadium was outdated the two years they were in there and it was gone by 2001. Plus, football rules the town so the dirt infield ala Oakland was a no-go.

    Coors Field was the best investment made in downtown Denver in decades. It absolutely revitalized a dilapidated area that now thrives as do the neighborhoods around it.

    Despite being the third-oldest NL stadium, it's still a fantastic game-day experience. Great location. Easy access (especially if you know where to park/get out). Great sight lines. Great views of the Rockies, though I get those every day looking to the West. The ownership sucks, but they've invested in the off-the-field product with the party porch in right field.
     
  4. Vombatus

    Vombatus Well-Known Member

    Wow. 3rd oldest NL stadium. That means there are probably some obsessive fans out there who have attended a game in 27+ NL stadiums. Crazy.

    Why can't we build things to last? Disposable electronics. Disposable stadiums.
     
  5. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    I'm not sure what's worse: That the third-oldest NL stadium opened in my freshman year of college, or that two of the seven MLB stadiums I've been to have been extinct for more than a decade.
     
  6. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Crazy that Texas and Atlanta built new stadiums after Coors opened and have replaced them. Oh, and Coors isn't going anywhere. Team and the city just signed a 30-year lease extension.

    The bad thing for the Rockies is they get zero money from Coors in naming rights. Coors chipped in $30 million when MLB picked Denver to have a team. $15 million went to the naming of Coors Field ... "in perpetuity."

    It might be the second-biggest sports deal after the Silna brothers, which cannot be topped.
     
  7. FileNotFound

    FileNotFound Well-Known Member

    Looked at another way, the second-newest NL team has the third-oldest stadium. (This of course assumes you don't think of the Nationals as a "new" team.)
     
  8. cisforkoke

    cisforkoke Well-Known Member

    Talk about that.
     
  9. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    Say please. ;)
     
  10. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    If memory serves the committee that ran the campaign for the ball park was saying ownership would pay 30% of the park. Which was a flat out lie. Ownership was going to pay nothing. So once the got the tax passed they still had a hole to fill
    What makes the new stadium in Atlanta a better experience than the "old" stadium?
     
  11. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    You might be right. But the stadium has been paid off from a taxpayer standoff. The new lease includes zero taxpayer money for 30 years. The football stadium is paid off. And the city has benefitted immensely from both.
     
  12. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    On a side note, as a kid, I used to love watching NFL games that were played on dirt infields. I liked seeing the uniforms get dirty.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page