1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Budget talks: This is getting nasty

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by printdust, Jul 13, 2011.

  1. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Obama actions and decisions for past month were to weighted towards his 2012 reelection. It will prove to be his downfall.
     
  2. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    What he says and what he does are different. He talks a good game. He folds. He bends over backwards to get things done even if they aren't close to being the terms he was elected to get them done on -- and for all of Carlton's bluster about the Tea Party mandate, let's not forget that Obama had a bigger "mandate" that he could have and should have pushed. The generous narrative has been that he wants a Lincoln-like presidency; how many times have we heard the inspiration of "Team of Rivals"? Personally I wish he'd read The Art of War or something a bit more aggressive.
     
  3. Deeper_Background

    Deeper_Background Active Member

    Federal Reserve policy-makers began meeting Tuesday morning, and the Fed's statement is due at 2:15 p.m EDT [1815 GMT]
     
  4. Stitch

    Stitch Active Member

    What would Nixon think of organic strawberry ice cream?
     
  5. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    The "taxed enough already" backronym was made up after the fact to fit the revolutionary mythology the astroturfers made up to encompass the movement to make the White House White Again.

    Of course if they knew anything about history (which of course they don't, mostly being ignorant idiots) they would know the original Tea Party, as much as it was about taxes, was an attempt to attack a massive monopolistic corporation (you know, the kind the teabaggers go insane insisting we must protect at all costs) for ruthlessly price-gouging captive American consumers.

    Mainly they want the mooslim neegro out of the White House. By any means necessary.

    And they don't want to pay no taxes for nothing, at all, ever.

    That's it. That's Teabagger America.
     
  6. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Nixon seemed more like a plain vanilla kind of President.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  7. Stitch

    Stitch Active Member

    I keep saying Somalia is where it's at.
     
  8. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    So, Starman, you seem to think that the Teabaggers' primary issue is that we now have an (Other Than) White House. Are we to assume, then, that you think the Teabaggers would be in support of Obama's policies if he weren't burdened with the melanin-onical impediment?
     
  9. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    They didn't seem very concerned over the policies of his lily-white predecessor, which cranked the budget deficit over the moon (after inheriting a budget surplus).

    The teabagger movement sprung into organized existence on Jan. 24, 2009. Go look it up.
     
  10. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Nah, why bother? You seem to have all the answers.
     
  11. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    And it sprang from (and wholly swallowed the membership of) the birther movement, which is undeniably racist.
     
  12. Bob Cook

    Bob Cook Active Member

    OK, Ragu, what say you? Stocks start falling after the Fed does NOT say it will do QE3.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page