1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bush: OK, I've got a plan. No, this one will work, honest.

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by dog428, Jan 10, 2007.

  1. Yawn

    Yawn New Member

    Bush has plenty of blame in this in his ship celebration. I'll agree that we didn't have a plan once we toppled Saddam's statue that those loving Muslims kicked, spat upon then dragged through the city in joy.

    I'm not so sure that leaving would bump up gas to $6 a gallon when these economic fools were also telling us that gas was high because of demand in India and China. Like they've gone back to rickshaws in force. That price occurs only if these bastards want to keep the shit in the ground and dry up the West as a whole. Before that happened, war would occur on the oil fields and it wouldn't just be us. Right, China?

    There is no perfect solution. That window became very narrow when we didn't seal the borders, keep Saddam's military infrastructure together at at least the lower levels, then began reducing personnel. Whatever happens is going to come at a cost, though. Including quitting.

    If the Kurds had gained independence, you wonder sometimes if Saddam in power wasn't so bad. These humans understand that kind of government, and little else.
     
  2. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    ::)
     
  3. Angola!

    Angola! Guest

    We would all respect Bush if he would just do the following:
    Fuck, shit, balls, cock, jizzum, grandma! I admit I was wrong. We never should of attacked Iraq, but now we can't leave Iraq, so we should just cut our losses and leave."
     
  4. steveu

    steveu Well-Known Member

    Agree. Voinovich is one thing, since he often doesn't side with his own party, but Brownback? That's about as die-hard conservative as you can get.
     
  5. Actually, the words are Sadr City, and the troops aren't going to accomplish anything except dying. And, frankly, I'm more worried about this guy starting to futz around with Iran and Syria. Chuck Hagel mentioned Cambodia when he was tearing Condi Rice a new one yesterday, and he's right. This guy wants two more wars.
     
  6. Columbo

    Columbo Active Member

    No.

    REALITY is that more troops sent over there only means more Americans dead, and not a whiff of change to what is going on over there.

    Pull your head out...PLEASE
     
  7. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Yawn:

    You picked ALL the losers, and were so, so cocksure about it.

    You're more pathetic than W.
     
  8. Yawn

    Yawn New Member

    Considering the mentality of the people in here who loathe Bush, I consider that a compliment. Thank you.
     
  9. Been a while, hasn't it.
     
  10. DyePack

    DyePack New Member

    You must have listened to too much Daughtry.

    I tend not to believe, word for word, what an office-seeking politician says a year before the primaries.
     
  11. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    So you're saying that if that politician were to instead punk out and not say a thing against The Mother of Bad Ideas, he/she would then be worthy of your praise?
     
  12. DyePack

    DyePack New Member

    Then he'd come across as a Bush apologist.

    Same skepticism, different opinion.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page