1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Chevy Volt a Failure - GM to Layoff 1,300

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Evil Bastard (aka Chris_L), Mar 2, 2012.

  1. Bamadog

    Bamadog Well-Known Member

    Musk is little different than other automotive hucksters like Malcolm Bricklin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Bricklin and his silly Bricklin SV-1 or Geraldine Elizabeth "Liz" Carmichael and the three-wheel Dale car http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dale_sports_car. But at least they didn't demand billions of dollars of infrastructure be constructed to recharge the playthings of plutocrats.
     
  2. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    "demand" ?

    "billions" ?
     
  3. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    I'm thinking that Tesla hopes to be bought by one of the bigger auto companies at some point for their proprietary technology.
     
  4. Bamadog

    Bamadog Well-Known Member

    forgot the dollars. At least the Bricklin or the DeLorean for that matter required no additional infrastructure. Except wider parking spots to accommodate the gull-wing doors. It's been a long week in the prep basketball trenches.
     
  5. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    I think he's wondering where you got the words "demand" and "billions" out of Tesla's involvement in President Bush's $8 billion low-interest loan program to help jump-start technology and wean the country from its oil dependency.
     
  6. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    That is the only way it can survive, and there has been a lot of speculation that it could be a takeover target.

    The main hindrance to that happening, is that if you buy that company, you are buying more than $800 million in debt.
     
  7. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    It would be a buy if a company feels that it would be cheaper to buy Tesla for their technology, rather that create it for themselves.
     
  8. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Companies are already looking to do likewise with Fisker.
     
  9. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    The Chinese are looking at the company. ... but it is a garage sale at this point. Whoever buys it is going to get it for a tony fraction of what the company was valued at a few years ago. It's sad.

    To put it into perspective, someone is going to get whatever assets Fisker has for $300 to $350 million.

    Fisker has blown through $1.2 billion of VC money and another $192 million in money from the U.S. government.

    The main obstacle on this one is that the only companies circling around it are Chinese, including one that is state owned, and there are already people yelling about the fact that U.S. government money was invested. ... to a company that will potentially be sold to China, for less than 50 percent of what the U.S. just gave away to the company.
     
  10. Bamadog

    Bamadog Well-Known Member

    Bush=not a conservative. And every president, even Reagan, has had this amazing goal of weaning us off "foreign oil." If that oil comes primarily from Mexico and Canada, what's the problem?
     
  11. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Not that you answered the question yet, but I think W would disagree with your assertion that he's not a conservative.
     
  12. Football_Bat

    Football_Bat Well-Known Member

    Game-changer.

    http://www.kcet.org/news/rewire/science/more-good-news-on-those-carbon-supercapacitors.html

    If this pans out, we'll see electric cars that will compete with fossil fuel cars in price and performance.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page