1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Chevy Volt a Failure - GM to Layoff 1,300

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Evil Bastard (aka Chris_L), Mar 2, 2012.

  1. Football_Bat

    Football_Bat Well-Known Member

    I'd love to see that GIF.
     
  2. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

  3. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Critical look at Electric cars.

    http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/2013/04/05/lomborg-electric-cars-get-dumber-day

    "Moving beyond the economics, Lomborg conducted some excellent research and determined electric automobiles fail to live up to their “green” promises and in fact cause more environmental harm than good. "
     
  4. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Instittute

    Nice source. Are they still trying to say second hand smoke won't hurt you?
     
  5. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    This is not new news.

    Other sources:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22001356

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19830232

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10231102-54.html

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2100936/Study-shows-impact-electric-cars-worse-petrol-powered-vehicles.html



    The bottom line is, the environmental friendliness of EVs depends a great deal on where they are charged and how electricity is generated in those areas. If power generation gets less polluting, so will EVs. That said, gas-powered cars are more efficient and less polluting than ever and are also getting better in that regard.
     
  6. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Ah yes, when you don't have an argument, shoot the messenger.
     
  7. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    No, it's called taking two seconds to look at your posting source.

    If you area a journalist, or ever were a journalists, your sources are your reputation.

    You don't see me posting from wing nut groups, do you?
     
  8. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2020769316_hybridsalesclimbxml.html

    Hybrid sales up 19 percent. Car sales up 6 percent.

    And when that battery technology catches up...
     
  9. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    When is that going to be?
     
  10. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    Interesting that these articles never include the environmental costs of oil and gasoline production when calculating the carbon footprint of internal combustion cars.

    And never mention solar or wind energy at all.
     
  11. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Are you suggesting that you outfit cars with sails? Interesting idea.
     
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Hybrids are 3 to 4 percent of all auto sales in the U.S. Much less worldwide. Plug-in hybrids, such as the Chevy Volt are a fraction of a percent of all auto sales. They don't even register. Hybrid sales are up 19 percent, but that is just for one quarter year over year. Aside from the fact that short a period could be an aberration (even though I don't think it probably is), it doesn't say much. If I sell one coca-cola powered vehicle this quarter, my sales are up 100 percent over the same quarter last year. The relatively low amount of hybrids being sold (3 to 4 percent of all auto sales) means it doesn't take many incremental sales to say, "Hybrid sales are up 19 percent."

    Battery technology hasn't done much in more than 100 years. Catches up to what?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page