1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Choose a side: Al Qaida declares war on France

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by poindexter, Sep 14, 2006.

  1. NDub

    NDub Guest

    Triumph must have been too witty for JR and Ashy Larry.
     
  2. Ashy Larry

    Ashy Larry Active Member

    fuckin' worcester guys....always bustin' balls! ;D
     
  3. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Yup, lots of countries are "against everything America does." One might have guessed that the country that was bailed out by the U.S. in two world wars it would have lost to an invading occupier might not be one of them.

    De Gaulle led the "Free French" during WWII... from Algeria. Meanwhile, the real France was giving more to the Nazis than they even asked for, in any way you can measure. Anti-semitic policies that went beyond what the Germans were asking. Producing goods for the war effort beyond what the Germans asked. In fact, the Vichy government was pretty popular until it became apparent that the Germans were starting to lose the war.

    I think it's fair to bring their principles into this, when history tells a pretty clear story.
     
  4. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    France was bailed out by a coalition of Allies, of which the U.S. played a major part.

    Maybe part of the problem here is the U.S. claiming total responsibility for the Allied victory, particularly when a bunch of countries were in the trenches two years before the Americans showed up.

    De Gaulle lead the Free French quite admirably from Algeria. His not being in the country doesn't diminish his considerable achievements.

    And Vichy France wasn't the "real" France. C'mon.
     
  5. three_bags_full

    three_bags_full Well-Known Member

    Read up on the Battle of the Capes.

    We owe a lot of our independence to the French.

    They get a pass from me.
     
  6. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    You want to really learn about the French in WWII read "An Army At Dawn" by Rick Atkinson-

    It is first of Trilogy he is Doing on WWII

    This is about war in North Africa- Starts with US landing in Morroco and Algiers - who are we fighting - non other than the French who are then aligned with the Germans. Once on the run many of the French changed sides.

    DeGaulle was upset from the get go because he was not given greater authority in planning landing.

    France as a country has a history of cutting and running - it is a very soft country.
     
  7. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Hey JR - fuck you - Has the US ever as a country done anything right to suit your tastes?
    You must have some french blood in you.
     
  8. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    You bastard!
    I told you that in confidence!
     
  9. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Go find some Normandy veterans. Ask them if the contributions of the Maquis groups came before or after American tanks were rolling down the Champs-Elysees. You'll be surprised to find out that it wouldn't have happened without les partisans providing intelligence and sabotaging German facilities beforehand. In fact, you'll probably be dead-on stunned to find out that German troops preferred to surrender to American troops rather than to the Maquis. Ask those Normandy veterans about the Free French 2d Armoured Division under Gen. LeClerc, which landed at Normandy with the rest of the Allies and led the drive to Paris.

    For that matter, ask veterans of the Allies' 1943 campaign driving up the Italian boot about how well 100,000 Free French soldiers acquitted themselves.

    Bitch all you want about the incompetence and cowardice of politicians of any national stripe (Henri Phillippe Petain is the obvious example, but certainly not the only one --- we have our own politicians who are more interested in promoting themselves than the common good), but don't make the mistake of assuming that a nation's politicians are the same as a nation's people.
     
  10. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    JR --

    Saying the U.S. played a small part in deciding WW I is just wrong. The war was a stalemate until the U.S. joined in and would have stayed that way -- or eventually resulted in revolutions within the involved nations -- if not for American intervention. Its forces were the fresh blood needed to break the stalemate in favor of the allies.

    The theory on WW I's effect on the French psyche is interesting. But there were other countries whose psyches were similarly affected. That's how Hitler came to power -- by preying on the national shame in Germany at the time. Weren't those countries devastated, too? Why didn't they become pussies?

    And your theory that France was outmanned in WW II is also off-base. In 1939, France had more people in its armed forces than any country except Russia.

    As for the statement about Dunkirk, that was a small part of the British army. Big enough that it would have been a major setback for England if the BEF was wiped out, especially since the forces at Dunkirk were veterans (the ones left in England were relatively inexperienced). Hence the retreat, rather than annihilation or capture at Dunkirk.

    And no matter what your opinion is on the Xs and Os of the combat part of WW II, remember that the U.S. was supporting a large chunk of the entire allied effort through the lend-lease act.
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Come on, man. You are straining to give me some examples of the French helping themselves (wow!) when the real history lesson is that the Nazis invaded and six weeks later the Nazi flag was flying over the country. You are talking about guerrilla groups of a few thousand resistors here, ten thousand more there. Meanwhile, MILLIONS of French people were sucked pretty easily into the Axis machine.

    There were 47 Divisions at Normandy.... 19 were British, 21 were American. ONE was a Free French division. I think it's fair to say that the U.S. bailed the French out from Nazi rule. And I think it is pretty definitively how history judges what happened... even French history.
     
  12. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Nazi Germany rolled into France? Look to history ... Nazi Germany did that to a lot of countries (only the Russian winter stopped Hitler's advance on the Eastern Front, because the Red Army certainly didn't slow the swastika down until the winter of 1941-42 gave it a chance to regroup). In fact, one can make a very strong case for the Red Army doing a helluva lot more to wear down Germany between 1942 and 1945 than American forces did.

    I'll say it again: Go ask Normandy veterans about the contributions of the Resistance to the successes of D-Day. Ask veterans of the Italian campaign about the contributions of the French.

    Actually, the main thing he started "bitching" about was the constitution of the new Fourth Republic, which he felt was too weak. He was correct --- the Fourth Republic was unstable and fell in 1958 due to the pressure caused by the Algerian crisis. Most of what you may consider "bitching" was simply de Gaulle standing up for his nation instead of kowtowing before America.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page