1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Climate Change? Nahhh ...

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Riptide, Oct 23, 2015.

  1. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Also a lot fewer people to service.
    In 1900, there were 102,000 people living in Los Angeles, 5,500 in Phoenix, 7,500 in Tucson and 25 in Las Vegas. Even as recently as 1940 or 1950 those could still be considered relatively small or mid-sized cities.
    In 2021, those four metro areas alone have a combined population of about 12 million, all relying on the Colorado River for water. And that's not even counting the huge population in other parts of Southern California and Arizona.
     
  2. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    I mentioned earlier, 30 years ago Santa Barbara built a desalination plant then after a drought went away, they closed it down, but decided to maintain it for future droughts. It reopened in 2014 and now 30 percent of the city's water comes from there.

    Granted, Santa Barbara isn't L.A. or San Diego, but it's long past time to build these plants and build pipelines to Nevada and Arizona.

    Santa Barbara - Desalination
     
    Neutral Corner, swingline and Batman like this.
  3. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  4. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    It may be less than 15 minutes away.

     
  5. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    If they start a back fire to try and undercut it, will it be called the Wal-Mart Fire?
     
  6. TrooperBari

    TrooperBari Well-Known Member

  7. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  8. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  9. Driftwood

    Driftwood Well-Known Member

  10. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  11. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    The problem with desalination is the cost. Plants are expensive as hell. It is a lot cheaper for a municipality to buy out the water rights of some farmers. In California a lot of water is sprayed on alfalfa, which is a feedstock and not particularly high value. In Colorado it is cheaper to buy out a melon farmer on the Arkansas river and run it to the Denver Metro area.

    As snow packs decline in the Rockies due to warmer tempatures the urban areas will get their water. The solution will be to buy out the farmers.
     
  12. Driftwood

    Driftwood Well-Known Member

    Buying out farmers to quench thirsty cities. What could possible be the impact of that? It's not like farmers produce things we need.
     
    Inky_Wretch and MileHigh like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page