1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Deadspin: ESPN laying off hundreds today

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by da_grand_pubah, May 21, 2013.

  1. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    You don't think ESPN focus-groups this stuff to death?

    If not, they're idiots.
     
  2. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    But that's not how they promote themselves. They promote SportsCenter as the go-to source for sports news. It certainly isn't an Entertainment Tonight. Granted, they have no reason to change now, but hopefully another network's show will gain a foothold with viewers and provide a challenge.
     
  3. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    And that's essentially what they are. ESPN, and SportsCenter, are the biggest go-to for sports news. It doesn't mean they're going to cover everything, and it doesn't mean they're not going to give more time to sports they own the TV rights to.

    It's not a newspaper. It's a highlight show on a network that televises sports. It sometimes gets more journalistically ambitious than that, but it's still a highlight show.
     
  4. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    So 60 Minutes should restrict their personality profiles to people on shows broadcast by CBS or the cable networks it owns? As a journalist, you should want the show that is the de facto national reporter of sports news to actually report the sports news, not "What's Hot," "What's Next," "What Evs"
     
  5. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Cricket is played and watched by a ton of people. It's "sports news".

    A segment (albeit small) of ESPN viewers would be thrilled by 7-8 minutes of cricket news on SportsCenter at the expense of 2 minutes of NBA playoffs, 2 minutes of baseball, 2 minutes of NHL and 2 minutes of golf/tennis/etc.

    Should they do it?
     
  6. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    No. "60 Minutes" is not "SportsCenter," and I'm not saying what "SportsCenter" should or shouldn't do. It will do whatever ESPN wants it to do. It has no ethical considerations in its coverage choices. Again, it's a vehicle to show you tall men dunking basketballs and Mark Sanchez running face-first into a lineman's ass. Sometimes it aims higher and produces good journalism, but 90 percent of its purpose is variations of "that leaves the yard, and the Yankees lead 2-0..."

    As a journalist, I don't care what a highlight show does.
     
  7. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    I would love to see cricket highlights.

    And the answer to your question is "no."
     
  8. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    The 49ers also don't have Super Bowl chances.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  9. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    Fixed ... because West Coast teams not in LA always seem to get shafted, too. But it's "SportsCenter in LA!"
     
  10. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I don't think I've watched more than 10 minutes of anything on ESPN other than live sports in 20 years.
     
  11. lantaur

    lantaur Well-Known Member

    Layoffs haven't affected hirings. Gary Parrish just tweeted congrats to Jeff Goodman on landing a gig with ESPN.
     
  12. tmr

    tmr Member

    James Miller's ESPN book helped me understand how SportsCenter works, and how it's basically separate from what a lot of ESPN does. It's pretty interesting for discussions like this one. I believe he and Richard Sandomir are still working on a big ESPN story, or series, for the Times.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page