Design thread

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

Seriously...why the need for the cheap shot? We know. You think all designers are idiots.

So why do you come on a design thread?

Go stir shit elsewhere, please, and let those of us who are trying to get better continue to try to get better.

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

(The Jeopardy clock ticks.)

(Crickets chirp, at least in someplace warm.)

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

How come no one has posted a new page to critique lately?

Nuff with the bickering and get on with the constructive design thread, please?

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

There were two new pages posted today. They were just about three pages ago.

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

Oh, who asked you?

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

they could've picked better art for the beanpot story

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

I dunno. Could this----really measure up to a bar code? :

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

Wouldn't the subhead on that look better in straight black, maybe even with a white outline? When it gets to "Bowl XL win: P. 103 it's on a fairly light background.

Oh, and I had the big ad on the bottom. I know, I know, nothing you can do about it. Still hate it.

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

What's the consensus on the featurey treatments some papers give to gamers? Seems like this type of play should be reserved for features. Here are a couple examples.

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

I think the bottom page nees to use "Super Bowl" in display type a few dozen more times.

Newspapers have gotten very weak with their display type. Very weak.

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/4*

Well, I'll put my neck out there. Discuss. Pages 6-7 of 11 SB pages.