Design thread

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

That made little sense.

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

All I wanted was a little feedback on a page, and that's your contribution. Why? Can you explain why?

Nobody snickered along with you. The consensus is that the statement didn't contribute anything.

In other words, what's your problem? If you could explain it, we might understand your viewpoint.

To reiterate ... not laughing. Pitying. Trying to understand what makes something like you tick. But not laughing.

(Sorry, rob and others. I held it for a couple of weeks now.)

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

It speaks for itself. Isn't it all about content? I mean, that's what designers say.

This is not earth-shattering content. It's play summaries. Is that not a basic part of telling the story?

I guess I'd ask why people have such a problem grasping that, or realizing that not every page is headed for the Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art.

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

Other than maybe a little too much black bar -- and I realize you're gong for the Steelers black-and-gold effect -- great stuff, shot.

But why no helmets?

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

I'm with Spnited, Shottie. I totally think you need some helmets on there.

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

I didn't show you my stats package.  ;D

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

Yeah, I got my package right here. ;D

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

The small type was appropriate.

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

have you ever seen a boroadsheet hb?

 

Re: Design thread *Updated 2/6*

A boroadsheet? No.

A broadsheet? Yes.
;D