1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Do Vegetarians and Vegans Think They Are Better Than Everyone Else?

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by 3_Octave_Fart, Aug 7, 2013.

  1. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    I don't care about the distinction.
     
  2. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    He eats meat. There's no distinction in anyone's mind except maybe Devil's.

    He was vegan for a while. (Though I'm not sure he was ever "strict".) He no longer is. His daughter isn't either.
     
  3. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    If you're hosting folks who only eat organic, be sure you don't let the store slice your organic bread with a slicer that is also used on conventional bread:

    [​IMG]
     
  4. SpeedTchr

    SpeedTchr Well-Known Member

    If you're truly concerned about the "organic integrity" of your home, you should never leave that home.
     
  5. JayFarrar

    JayFarrar Well-Known Member

    Giving up meat for Lent, again, starting tomorrow.

    That's just red meat and poultry. Fish and such is still on the menu.

    About the only thing I miss during Lent is cheeseburgers, which I adore.
     
  6. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member


    Wait... so some people do not consider fish a meat?

    They are called Catholics? That's with a "c", right?

    Damn, I wonder if anyone else has ever heard about this small subculture of America that still eats fish when giving up meat? Wow, they must have a little secret meeting place in some vague place like Italy. They probably have some secret chant or some sign they wear like a cross. Fuck, I gotta stay on the lookout for these people? Is this a new thing, or have they been around for a few thousand years?
     
  7. JayFarrar

    JayFarrar Well-Known Member

    I'm not Catholic. I don't give up fish/seafood because Orthodox rules are peculiar as I think fish with backbones are to avoided, but shellfish are okay.

    But I think the backbone rule only applies to saltwater fish, while freshwater fish are okay. So I couldn't sea bass but I could eat two pounds of fried catfish.

    Beats the blankity blank out of me.
     
  8. SpeedTchr

    SpeedTchr Well-Known Member

    If you ate two pounds of fried catfish, you'd have an unorthodox shittin' problem!
     
    Vombatus likes this.
  9. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    You shouldn't revisit this as often as you do. You are dragging out what may be your worst moment on here.

    It doesn't matter what you "consider" meat. It isn't a matter of opinion. Fish are animals. Vegetarians don't eat animal flesh. It's the defining characteristic of a vegetarian.

    No matter how much you want to push this, it is what it is -- not what 93Devil wants it to be (and stomping your feet every once in a while on here doesn't change it).

    If you make a choice not to eat beef or poultry or both, but you still eat fish, you are NOT a vegetarian. You're someone who chose not to eat beef or poultry. By virtue of the fact that you eat fish, you are NOT a vegetarian. A vegetarian isn't defined by what someone "considers" meat. It's defined by what *is* meat: the flesh of an animal.

    Some people use the word "pescetarian" (attributed to a 1993 origin when I just looked) to describe those people, for what it is worth.
     
    Dick Whitman, Dyno and YankeeFan like this.
  10. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Pretty steep curve there, I'd wager.
     
  11. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Wow. That discussion is much more awesome than I remembered. Thanks for the revisit.
     
    YankeeFan likes this.
  12. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    I am not religious, but I was raised in a very traditional Catholic home.
    We abstained from meat, including poultry, every Friday, not just during Lent.
    Never once was that referred to as vegetarian.

    There really is no issue of distinctions or opinions. It is just a matter of definitions and the denotative meanings of words.

    Would one start referring to "red" as "blue" because one doesn't care about the distinction or because one has developed a different definition for "red"?
     
    YankeeFan likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page