Donaghy: 2002 NBA Playoffs series fixed

I would do anything for the dunk contest to be half as "contrived" as it was 20 years ago.

Jordan benefited from having the crowd. To be fair, he wasn't exactly bad in that contest.

 

True. But it was after that weekend when he started to get pumped up by the league.

Does anyone have a clip of David Stern admitting that he wouldn't make the mistake of making the NBA a one man league again?

 

Uh oh....Dick Bravetta is being grilled by the FBI.

The saga continues.

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/25125903/

FBI investigating Bavetta over fixing claims
Referee was one of three working Lakers-Kings playoff game in 2002
NBCSports.com news services
updated 4:47 p.m. ET, Thurs., June. 12, 2008
The FBI is investigating NBA referee Dick Bavetta in response to allegations by ex-ref Tim Donaghy that Game 6 of the 2002 Western Conference finals between the Lakers and Kings was rigged, the New York Times reported Thursday.

Bavetta was one of three referees to work that game, along with Bob Delaney and Ted Bernhardt.

Delaney told ESPN that he had not been contacted by the NBA or FBI.

The FBI agents asked retired referee Hue Hollins about Bavetta and if he "was making sure that the home team would win, and I told them I had no idea because I didn't work with him a lot," according to the New York Times.

"They were very specific about their questioning, as though they had heard something," Hollins said, according to the Times. "They knew exactly what they were going after."

If Donaghy’s latest allegations are true, Kobe Bryant won his last championship with the help of an NBA conspiracy.

And Scot Pollard is still ringless because some guys in suits determined it would be that way.

Even with Bryant chasing another title in a marquee NBA finals matchup between the Los Angeles Lakers and Boston Celtics, the league still can’t escape the Donaghy mess, now nearly a year after learning the former referee bet on games he officiated.

And the people who thought the spotlight would be theirs alone are pretty fed up.

“The whole Donaghy thing just makes me sick, if you want me to be honest,” Boston coach Doc Rivers said Wednesday. “Paul Pierce got injured and we questioned him, but we believe Donaghy? When you think of the logic of that crap, it really ... I’m not going to go any further, but our league is a great league, and that stuff bothers me a lot. It really does.”


In a letter filed Tuesday in New York, Donaghy’s attorney made a series of allegations about officiating corruption and misconduct within the NBA. The most damning accusation centered on the 2002 Western Conference finals, when the Lakers rallied from a 3-2 deficit to beat the Sacramento Kings.

Donaghy said two referees known as “company men” worked the controversial Game 6, when the Lakers shot 27 free throws in the final quarter and scored 16 of their last 18 points at the line in a 106-102 victory.

The injured Pollard, who now plays for Boston, was on Sacramento’s team, while Bryant and Derek Fisher played for the Lakers squad that went on to sweep New Jersey for its third straight championship.

“I don’t know how you determine the game was rigged,” Fisher said. “Obviously, I was there in the game. I don’t remember any moment thinking, ’They’re helping us out a little bit.’ A lot of things change from game to game. Different officiating crews call games differently. I can’t comment on it. You still have to win the next game (Game 7). I’m not going to give my ring back, I know that.”

Pollard was angry when he heard the complaint and acknowledged believing it was possible at first, but dismissed the idea of a conspiracy among referees because it’s too big a secret to keep for this long. And much like NBA commissioner David Stern a night earlier, he portrayed Donaghy as a criminal willing to say anything to save himself.

“For a guy that wasn’t at that game, didn’t ref that game, to come out and say that, and in the situation he’s in, I guess you could kind of say you could equate that to Charles Manson saying something about the Boston Strangler,” Pollard said. “He’s in the business, but he doesn’t really have a lot of credibility. He wasn’t there.”

News that the FBI was investigating Donaghy broke last July, shoving Bryant’s long-awaited first appearance with the U.S. national team out of the basketball headlines. Now the case has overshadowed the NBA finals’ return to Los Angeles.

Bryant dismissed Donaghy talk with a couple of one-word answers, invoking the name of the Patriots coach Bill Belichick — who knows a little about conspiracies from the Super Bowl videotaping scandal.

“I’m sorry to be Belichicky, but we don’t think about it too much, to be honest with you,” Bryant said. “It’s not something we focus on as players. I think it’s more talked about outside of our circles more than it is inside. We know whatever legal proceedings they have going on, they’ll get to the bottom of the situation, and for us as players, all we can do is play.”

Both coaches said they had no questions about the integrity of the referees, though the Lakers’ Phil Jackson said perhaps it would be best to have someone other than the league office govern the officials. Players’ association director Billy Hunter said no players have asked the union to investigate charges of referee corruption.

“To raise the issue of whether or not the games are set up and the outcome has already been dictated, I haven’t heard anybody raise that alarm or question,” he said.

Hunter added that he felt bad for the league, knowing that Donaghy’s accusations, though lacking specifics, will be accepted as the truth by some skeptics.

“Clearly it feeds to that whole psyche, folks believe that there’s a series of conspiracies and the outcome is dictated and that it’s almost a show,” Hunter said. “The last thing you want to do is to take on the aura of world wide wrestling.

“I think people want to believe that the winner is based on merit and the best team wins in a given circumstance and that there are no prerequisites. It’s not being staged. So what it does is it impacts the integrity of the game. So to that extent, yeah, I would be concerned, not just for the players, for the entire operation.”

 

They talked to Hollins *last year* about Bavetta. Again, it's being revealed now, but it's not a new development, just like the Feds have known Donaghy's claims for a long time.

 

That doesn't mean the investigation into Bavetta's concluded yet though.

 

Of course. but just wanted to note when they talked to Hollins, as I've seen the Hollins interview mentioned in several places, but they leave out the fact it was last year, whether by accident or wanting to make it seem as if Tuesday's filing had the G-Men springing into action and chasing down old Dick, which, as we saw in his race against Barkley, wouldn't be hard to do (can't wait for the first person to accuse that race of being fixed, what with Bavetta and a known gambling degenerate like Barkley being involved). And the first line of this story says the New York times reports Bavetta is being investigated. The Times did not report that. They reported that the FBI has made inquiries. Made no mention if they're still doing it (although like you said, they may be). But people breathlessly write something that's not even true.

 

Not sure I buy the fix, but I would like to hear Bavetta, Delaney and Bernhardt explain exactly what they saw when they blew the whistle on Pollard and Divac on those possessions when it was obscenely obvious to everyone else that not a finger had been laid on Shaq. Or how a no call seemed like the right response to Kobe throwing a blatant forearm into Bibby's grill directly in front of a ref.

Given how long that game has been weighing on people's nerves, some sort of public explanation might ease suspicions a bit--provided they can come up with one.

 

geez...is this guy being singled out or what?

 

Yeah that line was pretty funny and bizarre, especially since his critics say Shaq was the only reason the Lakers won those titles. I guess it's not as sexy saying that Mark Madsen won his last NBA title with the help of a conspiracy.

 

Eric Gregg's strikezone was a matter of incompetance, but Dick Bavetta (who can be swayed by Grizzlies crowds) wasn't?

"A pattern of calls by the officials," isn't that exactly what Eric Gregg did? That wasn't a pattern of calls by an official?

Funny how nobody else responded to the post.

Also funny how Mizzou never deigned to respond to the direct question of how much more coverage this should be getting, and in what format.

 

Given how he talked about a dark cloud hung over the finals because of this, I'm sure that was probably his way of making the connection from then to now. I don't think he meant much by it.

 

I love how Hue (FUCK Scottie Pippen) Hollins is being brought in as some kind of shining light in this area.