1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Donald Trump: Come Kiss the Ring

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by YankeeFan, Dec 5, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    It blew up? Does that count as irony?
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2015
  2. Elliotte Friedman

    Elliotte Friedman Moderator Staff Member

    There is an explanation. It's right on the thread line. Tough to find for you guys, I know.
     
  3. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    What is a thread line?
     
  4. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    The thread you guys are talking about was deleted from public view. So registered users can't see it anymore. The moderating crew can see what happened to it, with an explanation. If you really care, that thread had turned into a nursery school playground argument between some immature users who are incapable of walking away from strangers they don't like on a message board.

    When you are critical of a thread having been nuked (you think it should have been locked instead), please keep in mind that a lot of times when a thread gets locked, one or more of the moderators have already gone in and deleted a bunch of problem posts before it got locked.

    When a thread runs on with several pages of people acting idiotically before any of us see it, it might be a PITA or very time consuming to have to go through the thread and clean up it post by post. So one of the moderators might decide it is just easier to remove the thread from public view and move on. That's probably what happened on that one.

    I'm not sure why it would matter to anyone, other than to have something to piss and moan about (I get that is SJ.com's national pastime). ... That thread had run its course. Nobody was adding anything important about the topic anymore.
     
  5. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Are you saying someone had moved the goalposts on that thread?
     
  6. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Nope. Lots of threads meander into other things. Not all of them end up with several users going off the rails.
     
  7. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Charles Blow finally writes a column I can agree with.

    Both the building up, and tearing down, of Carly Fiorina was the most inevitable chapter of this campaign:

    The media has a new darling in the Republican presidential disaster pageant: Carly Fiorina.

    She dominated, “dropped the mic,” “owned the stage” and of course she did it all while “standing in a pair of 3½-inch heels for three hours.”

    This amount of drooling should come with a year’s supply of bibs.

    It is true that she found a way to effectively engage and combat the Republican front-runner, something her male counterparts had struggled to do. Good for her.

    But before the fawning frenzy spins out of control, let’s take a breath and an honest look at whom it is that is being cheered.

    Part of Fiorina’s appeal, at least among Republicans, is the thirst for an outsider. A Washington Post/ABC News poll taken earlier this month found that 58 percent of Republicans and 64 percent of conservative Republicans want the next president to be “someone from outside the existing political establishment.”

    Like the other candidates at the top of the Republican field, Fiorina seems to fit that bill. Only Fiorina isn’t a political outsider by choice, but by defeat.


    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/09/2...hone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=0&referrer=
     
  8. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Why don't you throw them in the penalty box, then?
    There were valid points of discussion on that thread by plenty of others.
     
    SnarkShark likes this.
  9. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    Agreed. Most of us can behave. Why not get rid if the problem children rather than whole threads?
     
  10. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    If moderators nuke threads instead of issuing suspensions, then why threaten suspensions for board violations?

    They just pick it up again on other threads. Get a penalty box going instead. It will improve the site in the right ways.
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Because Jeff, who does the banning and suspensions, is not on here all of the time. Plus, when people get suspended or banned, it has never been done lightly. It's usually discussed among the moderators first. As a safeguard against acting rashly.

    Even if the moderators had the authority to unilaterally suspend or ban people at their discretion--because, for example, a thread had been derailed--we'd be criticized even worse for using that power than we already are for all the other things people have a problem with. Many of the people who complain the loudest about the moderating would find themselves banned from the site in that world -- rather than seeing an occasionally thread locked or removed because of something they did.

    In the case of that thread, even if the moderators had the ability to suspend the posting privileges of the people who had gone off the rails, it doesn't change the fact that that thread had already been ruined by several pages that amounted to little more than idiocy and people bickering with each other. The moderator who shut it down probably decided he had better things to do with his time than go through and edit it post by post to get rid the bullshit. I get it if you and Riptide don't like that decision, but please respect it. My point is that that particular thread had already run its course. It's not as if it was shut down early, while people were still adding to the conversation.
     
    Vombatus, HC and SnarkShark like this.
  12. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Thanks for the answers, Ragu.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page