1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Donald Trump: Should We Take Him Seriously? (Now leads 2012 GOP Field by 9%)

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Deeper_Background, Apr 8, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 27 of 30
  1. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    FYP :)
     
    RickStain, Apr 17, 2011
    #313
  2. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    I don't know what the smiley means, but to take at face value ... agree to disagree.
     
    LongTimeListener, Apr 17, 2011
    #314
  3. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Fox isn't sucking up to Trump.

    All of the networks are sucking up to Trump because if he's on people will watch.

    I liked when Conan O'Brien said Trump running for President was a "Gift from God"
     
    Mizzougrad96, Apr 17, 2011
    #315
  4. ifilus

    ifilus Well-Known Member

     
    ifilus, Apr 17, 2011
    #316
  5. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    Maybe if we ask extra-nice they'll hand us Kuwait too.
     
    Bubbler, Apr 17, 2011
    #317
  6. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Trump: OPEC, cut prices now!
    OPEC: No.
    Trump: You're fired!
    OPEC: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
     
    Inky_Wretch, Apr 17, 2011
    #318
  7. sportsguydave

    sportsguydave Active Member

    What a goofball.

    We've been the "celebrity chief executive" route before. It didn't end so well.
     
    sportsguydave, Apr 17, 2011
    #319
  8. Football_Bat

    Football_Bat Well-Known Member

    You mean the TARP money that was intended to free up money for personal and business lending, that banks sat on for more than two years, and that is now being used by them to speculate on commodities?
     
    Football_Bat, Apr 17, 2011
    #320
  9. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Yep.

    I didn't say I'd agree with the argument, but I think you could make the argument.

    Shoring up banks & financial institutions prevented the meltdown of the entire financial system -- if you believe its supporters.

    Obama's stimulus pumped some money into the economy and kept a lot of public sector employees on the payroll, but I don't think it prevented a depression -- despite the study mentioned in Dick's link.
     
    YankeeFan, Apr 17, 2011
    #321
  10. steveu

    steveu Well-Known Member

    Mike Huckabee, please run. Pretty please? Sugar on it??
     
    steveu, Apr 17, 2011
    #322
  11. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    If you mean the one that Oprah introduced to the world, I agree...
     
    Mizzougrad96, Apr 17, 2011
    #323
  12. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    There can be no sane doubt that borrowing money and pumping it into the economy makes the economy better in the short run. The question is whether it hurts more in the long run when that debt has to be paid back.
     
    RickStain, Apr 17, 2011
    #324
Page 27 of 30
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page