1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

East Coast Bias Bowl -- Running Super Bowl XLVI Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by MileHigh, Jan 22, 2012.

  1. young-gun11

    young-gun11 Member

    Oklahoma State agrees.
     
  2. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    The continued dismissal or diminishing of Joe Montana's talent and accomplishments is baffling. I am not a 49ers fanboy, I live out here now but didn't grow up here, but ... come on. Go look at that 1981 team, he had as little or less talent around him as any of Brady's early Super Bowl teams. Jerry Rice didn't arrive until 1985, and by then Montana had two Super Bowls and another appearance in an NFC championship game.

    Really don't understand it at all.
     
  3. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Favre, Rodgers and Starr, who am I missing?. The Raiders had 4 also, I think. Lamonica, Ganon, Plunkett and Stabler.

    Favre is the only QB is Packers history to lose a Super Bowl. (Starr lost the 1960 NFL CHampionship, The Eagles only title)
     
  4. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    Who was the Packers' fourth Super Bowl QB? Starr, Favre, Rodgers and ...?
     
  5. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Brady has two Super Bowl MVPS, one for XXXVI, which he didn't deserve, and one for XXXVIII, which he did.
     
  6. Herbert Anchovy

    Herbert Anchovy Active Member

    I think this is dead on and about time somebody said it. The Run and Shoot/Silver Stretch/Red Gun were way ahead of their time. And those teams were always fun to watch.

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/02/gilbride-thinks-his-houston-offense-has-been-vindicated/
     
  7. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Say what you want about Doug Williams. With that running game, that offensive line, and those receivers, his attributes were all they needed -- a pure pocket passer with a big arm, who was going to get every bit of time to go through his reads.

    +3 over tiny, lousy-rushing Denver with a midget defensive front was one of the biggest underdog bargains in the history of the event-- if not THE biggest.
     
  8. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Funny to look back on Brady's three Super Bowl wins and consider that he was seen as a premier game manager but a notch below the league's best quarterbacks. Barely a top-10 passer by rating most years, and for sure he was no Peyton Manning.
     
  9. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Ben, I remember covering Super Bowl XXII and interviewing Bronco nose tackle Greg Kragen on Media Day. He was a nice fellow and a good interview, but I remember looking at him and thinking "This guy isn't that much bigger than me. And he's a nose tackle!!!" An investment on Washington followed as soon as I reached a secure telephone.
     
  10. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member


    Only reason they were +3 is because Doug Williams was black.

    Dummies.
     
  11. joe king

    joe king Active Member

    Eagles also won NFL championships in 1948 and '49.
     
  12. NickMordo

    NickMordo Active Member

    Gronkowski's ankle is the biggest headline of the game as far as I'm concerned. He is the Patriots' go-to guy, more than Welker. Welker gets the receptions but when the game is on the line, Gronk is the biggest target out there. I bet the Giants go after him hard on the Patriots' first series, give his ankle a little love tap.

    It reminds me of the Dwight Freeney foot situation in the Super Bowl against the Saints. He was not the same player and it showed.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page