1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Elon Musk takes over Twitter

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Alma, Apr 25, 2022.

  1. matt_garth

    matt_garth Well-Known Member

    Little man may have broken his new toy.

     
  2. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    If he paid forty billion for Twitter and it just up and died?
     
  3. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    The hell you say!
     
    Inky_Wretch and maumann like this.
  4. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member









    Thread continues.
     
    matt_garth likes this.
  5. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    At this point, I have as much sympathy for Twitter employees as I do for Gannett ones.

    [​IMG]
     
    maumann likes this.
  6. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Twitter was not a very good business before Elon Musk bought it. It carried a decent amount (but workable) of debt, and it probably had way too many employees for a business its size and wasn't run very well.

    But in order to overpay that badly for it, he put together the largest leveraged buyout of a tech company ever, and the amount of debt he heaped onto that balance sheet is going to come with an interest payment of more than a billion dollars a year. The company's entire operations last year generated only about $630 million in cashr. ... so the bottom line is that he has no easy way to make the hole he dug for himself work.

    His whole MO has been subsidies, riding cheap money bubbles (to run up debt and dilute equity in his publicly traded company) and in the case of Tesla, a carnival barker act to try to pump up the value of the stock (enabling him to keep diluting the equity), because it is the only currency he has to work with.

    NONE of those methods are possible to bail him out on Twitter. So you are going to keep seeing stories of him flailing, firing people, trying to cut costs, acting out, trying BS, etc. He's gotten accustomed to bullshit and bubblegum translating into ever more money he can borrow or more equity he can sell to kick cans down the road. ... and right now he's learning that this time he screwed himself and he can't BS his way out of it.

    If his whole plan is to somehow make subscription revenue fill his shortfall. ... he's in over his head way beyond belief. If it was that easy, every flailing media (social or traditional) company would be coasting on easy street.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2022
    wicked likes this.
  7. matt_garth

    matt_garth Well-Known Member

    Trumpian.

     
  8. maumann

    maumann Well-Known Member

    Nikola Tesla died penniless, covered in pigeon poop, alone and forgotten. John G. Trump was called in to inspect Tesla's artifacts, including his "death ray."

    An apt act to follow for Elon Musk. Maybe he'll take John Trump's nephew with him this time.
     
    wicked likes this.
  9. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  10. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    I know Trumpists care about owning the libruhls more than anything. I know they participate in many cases for the purpose of destruction. (See DeVos and education, DeJoy and the post office, etc.)
    But is it really worth it to Musk to spend $44,000,000,000 to kill Twitter? Does he enjoy firing people that much?
     
  11. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

  12. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page