1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ferguson / Staten Island Decisions -- No Indictments

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Boom_70, Nov 16, 2014.

  1. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Why Michael Brown’s best friend’s story isn’t credible

    By Paul Cassell December 2

    Officer Wilson shot and killed Michael Brown, so Brown never had the chance to tell his side of what happened. But standing next to Brown for much of the time — and observing the fatal shots — was Brown’s best friend, Dorian Johnson. Johnson seems to have originated the “hands up, don’t shoot” narrative. But Johnson’s story constantly changed and diverged from the physical evidence. It seems hard to come to any other conclusion than that Dorian Johnson’s version is simply made up.

    http://wapo.st/1BfwOt2
     
  2. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    I haven't read the story, so I don't even know what the author's angle is, but referring to Johnson as Brown's best friend immediately calls this article into question. Johnson said he'd known "Big Mike" for about three months before the shooting.

    Refer to page 20:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/248126858/Dorian-Johnsons-Testimony-Before-the-Grand-Jury
     
  3. ColdCat

    ColdCat Well-Known Member

    But I'm sure these cases have nothing to do with race
    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/12/criming-while-white-twitter-reacts-to-garner-decision-with-tales-of-white-privilege/
     
  4. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Much different than the talk that suburban white families have their kids.
    "The cop is not your friend"
    "No you can't search my car"
    "Am I free to go"
    "I want to speak to an attorney"
     
  5. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Check out the hashtags #crimingwhilewhite and #alivewhileblack:

    http://mic.com/articles/105694/criming-while-white-brilliantly-destroys-law-enforcement-s-racial-double-standard

    https://twitter.com/hashtag/alivewhileblack?src=hash

     
  6. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

    It's Thursday. Has Kenny Britt been arrested?
     
  7. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

  8. franticscribe

    franticscribe Well-Known Member

    Why won't those evil, cop-loving prosecutors ever charge an officer with a crime?

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/sc-cop-charged-murder-unarmed-man-shooting-27362718
     
  9. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    EDIT: Never mind, I thought that was the previous case when I saw the South Carolina place. This is a different one, I see.
     
  10. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    And it only took four years for the charges to be filed!
     
  11. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Re: body cameras:

    In general I think they will help, and are a good idea. Both cops and the public will likely act more respectfully if they know they are on camera.

    But, it's no panacea. Firstly, they need to be turned on. A cop in Utah recently didn't have his camera on during a fatal shooting. I expect we'll see lots of this if they become widespread.

    And, I could see the process of saving/storing/archiving the footage to be a major problem. You just know that they won't be able to find, or will have taped over, footage that is sought by the public and/or the media.

    I also don't think we should be surprised that cops don't want the cameras. No one likes to have someone looking over their shoulder while they work. We saw this issue with airline pilots not long ago. They didn't want cameras in the cockpit (mostly because they were worried about their ability to nap during the flight).

    But, what work group wouldn't fight cameras?

    Does anyone think teachers would embrace video cameras in the classroom?

    If I drop of my dog at daycare, I can pull up a webcam and see how he's doing, and make sure he's being treated well. Why shouldn't parents have access to a password protected webcam and be able to check in on their kids, and make sure they are getting a good education?
     
  12. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Because, in general, parents are assholes. And some would want to micromanage every second of their precious snowflake's day. Helicoptering parents are a worse problem in this country than police shootings, IMO.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page