1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ferguson / Staten Island Decisions -- No Indictments

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Boom_70, Nov 16, 2014.

  1. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]

    It's heartening to see the youth of American put down their X Box controllers and find their voice.

    Eric Garner has quickly become this generations Che Guevara. The counter culture revolution is

    back. Maybe we'll get a good music sound track this time.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  2. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    I didn't say he was on anything. I said if it was a skinny kid who wasn't on anything. Meaning that a skinny kid who is drunk or on drugs might need four cops to take him down.

    Oh, and Garner was arrested 31 previous times. He seemed to survived all those other ones just fine. Did he resist them on any of those previous 31 occasions? If he did, then he should have known better than to resist them again. If he didn't, then why didn't he just let them handcuff him for the 32nd time and he'd be still alive.

    Garner was pissed because the cop caught him breaking the law, again, even for a law that, on the surface, seems rather petty. He lets them arrest him and process him, and he's alive today. But no, he has to argue and resist.

    He should know after 31 times that he has the right to due process. He was pissed that he was caught doing something illegal and decided to argue. Instead of illegal cigarettes, say he was dealing cocaine. Would you just let him keep dealing coke, or would you arrest him? And if he fights you, do you just shrug your shoulders, or take him down?

    Bottom line is, Eric Garner should have known better after 31 arrests than to fight the cops. The only embarrassing thing is that you are defending the actions of a chronic offender. Even if the offense he was getting arrested for seems stupid.
     
  3. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]

    Seems like the "Broken Window " policy of policing is broken
    and needs to be reevaluated.

    It's good every now and then that the police have a few windows broke
    to keep them in check.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  4. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Baron is owning this thread.
     
  5. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    There were only 28 arrests for marijuana possession in all of NYC in 2013? That doesn't make any sense.
     
  6. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Finding yourself agreeing with some of the points made by Baron and OOP make you reconsider your position in a way that is exceeded only by having Mark2010 agree with you on an issue.
     
  7. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Yup -- he took over possession from Rick S.
     
  8. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Haha. Republican strategists must be reading SportsJournalists.com


    Rick Wilson ‏@TheRickWilson 43s

    Should we demand body cameras on public school teachers?

    https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/540873922364071936
     
  9. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    I hope SportsJournalists.com never goes away.

    The cast of characters changes, but I am always entertained.
     
  10. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]

    Bringing this chart up again. Stunning numbers really. What a waste of
    public resources.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  11. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    How many times did Caleb Hannan get arrested in NYC in 2013? That's the real question.
     
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    They announced last month that they would be issuing summonses for marijuana possession, and no longer be making arrests.

    The reason the arrests dropped off last year is that the DAs in a few of the boroughs stopped prosecuting the cases.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page