1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ferguson / Staten Island Decisions -- No Indictments

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Boom_70, Nov 16, 2014.

  1. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Just because Wilson was attacked previously doesn't mean unloading 12 rounds from a half a football field away wasn't excessive force.
     
  2. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    So Wilson is just automatically telling the truth despite the incongruities we know about in his testimony?

    Remember Brown's friend's first statements that the cop pulled Brown into the car. That isn't necesarily right, but neither is the word of a guy who is trying to stay out of prison. There wasn't much effort to square all that up in the testimony.
     
  3. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Just because a 6'5 300-pounder with a puncher's attitude attacked a cop doesn't mean ...

    Sorry, SS, but that's not cutting it for me.
     
  4. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Nope. You shoot until the subject is neutralized.
     
  5. Hokie_pokie

    Hokie_pokie Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    If I'm the officer and you keep coming forward after I shoot you 3 times, I'm going to keep shooting.

    Sorry, but the point was to make Brown stop advancing.

    If it was proven that Brown had stopped and surrendered, but Wilson kept shooting, that's obviously another matter entirely.
     
  6. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    I've noticed this size thing seems to be a talking point folks on the right have adopted today to explain away the number of shots. I guess the implication being that firing 12 rounds and shooting him 6 times would be excessive if he was a normal sized guy, but hey, since he was 6'5" 289 it was perfectly fine.

    I'm just curious if those floating that reasoning have any evidence that it takes 6 shots to take down a 6'5" man. I always thought big guys were pretty much equally vulnerable and went down just as hard as little guys when a bullet has pierced their organs.
     
  7. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Wilson looks a lot like Jordan Zimmermann. Weird.
     
  8. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    I've voted Democrat since '89.
     
  9. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    What is this, the Walking Dead? An unarmed man was shot three times, and continued to charge this officer at his car, and then after he died, his body was magically moved 150 feet from his vehicle?
     
  10. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    There is conflicting testimony on whether Brown was "charging." Some witnesses said he was standing still, others said he was stumbling.
     
  11. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Congratulations?
     
  12. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    No spoilers! FUCK!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page