1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ferguson / Staten Island Decisions -- No Indictments

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Boom_70, Nov 16, 2014.

  1. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Brown had traces of gun powder on his hands, and Brown's blood was in the car.
     
  2. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Try bleeding on his shirt.
     
  3. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Wilson wouldn't have to face cross-examination if he doesn't testify at the trial. His lawyer, I would assume, wouldn't call him up.
     
  4. Hokie_pokie

    Hokie_pokie Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    There's a bit of difference between exercising one's constitutional rights and physically attacking a police officer.

    Although I suppose if you're black and live in Ferguson, Missouri, doing either is likely to wind up with you being shot to death.
     
  5. champ_kind

    champ_kind Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Songbird, are you are you aware how much bias is inherent in your imagining what Brown's thoughts must have been?

    Was it totally stupid to do anything but try to be on a cop's good side after he'd just committed a crime? Of course.

    There seems to be a lot of disconnect in the discussion. Someone can argue that a shooter killing someone 150 feet away is probably not justified in claiming he feared for his life. The person making that argument isn't necessarily claiming the guy who got shot was a "gentle giant" and didn't just commit a crime.

    Also interesting that those on this board who lean conservative are totally OK with automatically siding with the official story from government representatives over the story of "the people." And vice versa.
     
  6. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    It does fascinate me how much certain people don't like governmental power until it's applied against black people.
     
  7. Mr. Sunshine

    Mr. Sunshine Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Can't really do either when two cops have you pulled over on a lonely stretch of highway 500 miles from home.
     
  8. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Wouldn't the eye witnesses who testified be "the people"
     
  9. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    You should have asked the cops if you could record the encounter.
     
  10. Mr. Sunshine

    Mr. Sunshine Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  11. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Pussy ;)
     
  12. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    And yet something happened (read: was said) that made the cop put his car in reverse.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page