1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ferguson / Staten Island Decisions -- No Indictments

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Boom_70, Nov 16, 2014.

  1. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Who's ever defended any of these riots?
     
  2. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    But you haven't condemned them! You're letting them slide!
     
  3. SpeedTchr

    SpeedTchr Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    We might be twins...
     
  4. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    It's not a riot unless Anderson Cooper and the CNN team show up to do live broadcasts.
     
  5. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    The more cynical part of me suspects that people are trying to provoke riots by making such a big stink about them.

    "Man, we sure do hope there isn't any rioting! Oh please don't riot! That sure would suck! We'd hate it if the people who are frustrated with us do this one thing we keep making a big deal about! If we talk about it a lot, that'll stop them, right?"

    Then when it happens, they get to clutch their pearls and mutter code words about hoodlums and thugs and animals.
     
  6. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Forgot the word that proceeds Shiftless.
     
  7. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    That was basically why they waited all day and then made the announcement at night, right?

    The fact that people got angry enough to riot about the decision justified the decision.
     
  8. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    I condemn them.

    Next topic.
     
  9. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    The pressure to riot didn't come from pearl clutching white racists.

    The pressure to riot came from the media and the African-American community, who would have been let down by Ferguson if they didn't respond by, "burning the bitch down."

    If there's one thing worse than an African-American "acting white" by speaking proper English, or earning good grades in school, its an African-American without the common decency to burn loot and/or burn down his own city in response to a disappointing ruling from the criminal justice system or a natural disaster.
     
  10. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    Not harsh enough for me.
     
  11. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    The Missouri Lt. Governor -- who apparently does not have a speaking relationship with the Governor, and whom I'm guessing is a Republican -- gave an interview where he said that state Dems told him the local DA made the announcement that night because they were worried that the decision would be leaked by the Holder Justice Department.

    If true, it puts the decision in a whole different light.
     
  12. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Re: Ferguson Decision -- No Indictment

    That'd be in keeping with the DA playbook of blaming everyone else and praising himself.

    That is a Ferris Bueller's Day Off kind of chain of citation for that quote, though. We're about five removed from the actual "source," except there isn't a "source" in the first place.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page