1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ferguson / Staten Island Decisions -- No Indictments

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Boom_70, Nov 16, 2014.

  1. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    We are hurtling toward a really nasty moment in the form of dead cops. We can pretend that hammer killing wasn't related to the non-indictment but it was.

    People with nothing to lose are going up the ante and kill some cops. You hope it doesn't happen but the rage will reach a boiling point soon.
     
  2. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Look, OOP's insistence on this issue annoys me, but he's a funny guy otherwise and I'm not going that far.
     
  3. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    And now you're off into lying and trolling mode.
     
  4. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    In 1991 I didn't feel like I knew anyone on the cops' side when the Rodney King video came out. I'm sure people were out there, but that was about as unanimous in public opinion as it can get.

    I feel like if that happens today, the majority opinion would be "eh, large black man ... he MUST have done something to deserve it."
     
  5. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Yeah I think RickStain lost some support there.
     
  6. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    You changed your story. You used to deny you posted it at all and now you are claiming it was a joke.

    Mindless shark. Doesn't sound like something you say to somebody you like, but okay. It is a new one, so I give you credit for that. At least I understand what is really going on here now. I am sorry I hurt your feelings by bringing up a post that embarrasses you this much.
     
  7. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    I denied ever doing what you accused me of doing. Because I didn't. I never denied making whatever joke that caused you to start the accusation.

    And of course, you're repeating the accusation now. Where's your vaunted respect for standards of proof?
     
  8. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  9. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    He did place hundreds, if not thousands of people's lives in danger by leading the police on an eight-mile chase while driving drunk, on dope and acid, and on probation for armed robbery.

    The beating didn't knock some sense into him, as he was arrested multiple times for DUI and once for hitting his wife afterward.
     
  10. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    OK so they pulled him over and then needed to beat and try to kill him for ... ?

    I guess I didn't have to look too far to prove my point.
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Cause Joe Knucklehead, who managed to pass the police officer exam, is just the guy to be deciding who and who doesn't need a beating to knock some sense into them.
     
  12. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    I do wonder if the permanent brain damage might possibly have played a role in King's later behavior.

    But no bother. So far on that last page we had Baron justifying Eric Garner's death for "resisting arrest" and now the Rodney King beating.

    Different times, I guess, and some people believe the police can unleash whatever hell excites them on anyone who is perceived to have broken any law whatsoever. A lot of people believe that, actually.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page