FINALLY! SJ.com College Football Poll -- FINAL POST-BOWL POLL -- PAGE 48

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

He dropped WVU for "playing poorly" against Maryland, a school from a BCS conference. He kept Wisconsin in the same spot for playing like shit against Citadel. Both teams pulled away in the second half. Maryland ... Citadel ... makes perfect sense to me.

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

If you're gonna make your vote public, you're gonna hear from people. What's the problem? It's not like I pulled a spnited and called HB a fucking goddamn dickhead or anything.

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

Clarification: The only reason I posted my poll was to show that HB's prediction of big moves in this week's poll had already played out in my 1/36th share of it. But if you're going to post in public, be aware that it'll be open for scrutiny. So if you guys want to go after me for voting Cal ahead of Oklahoma, Virginia Tech 11 or Texas A&M 14, so be it.

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

Thanks once again for being SportsJournalists.com's morality police. I was questioning his logic, not influencing the process. I had no expectations he'd change his vote. Anything else you'd like to accuse me of while you're at it?

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

Well . . . .

I'm just stating it the way I see it. People who openly post their vote are making a mistake, because there will be people who loudly state their disagreements.

Not accusing or insulting anyone.

Seems that's more your modus operandi.

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

In the interests of keeping this thread civil, I'm not going to say what I think of your hypocrisy. Moving on ...

When was the last time the top four or five teams were so loaded, a justification could be made for any of them to be No. 1?

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

Recent history indicates that if you're interested in keeping a thread civil, you wouldn't post on it.

Again, don't get mad at me because you acted the jerk over someone else's vote, and I mentioned that maybe you shouldn't try to influence other voters. Call it whatever makes you feel good, but I think ripping someone's vote should not be done.

As for the rest, this is Week 3. At this point just about every season, there are a lot of teams that think they can make a case to be No. 1.

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

Ballot submitted. And, in agreement with Piotr, my ballot shall remain secret.

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

Am doing some of the totals now... I can say that there are two teams entering this that... well, I just need a shower because I feel dirty.

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

wow dude, your wife must really hate you. do you start every discussion with her, "you always/never ..." ?

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

Ooooohhhhh! :

 

Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NOTE -- 3p.m ET Monday ballot deadline

OK.. break it up.... we're not having this thread bootsed...