1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

FINALLY! SJ.com College Football Poll -- FINAL POST-BOWL POLL -- PAGE 48

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by slappy4428, Aug 22, 2007.

  1. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    And they covered, barely.

    Orville, please let me know how I can make good in my bet.

    P.S. Anthony Morelli and Austin Scott are fucking morons.
     
  2. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    Let it be noted that if you wanted to put all undefeated teams in the poll this week, you can't since there aren't enough to fill the spots.
     
  3. Barsuk

    Barsuk Active Member

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    Good call. I doubted the veracity of your claim, so I double-checked, and even if all the undefeated teams playing now rally to remain that way, it's only 24.
     
  4. Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    So that means Purdue will be ranked? Sweet.
     
  5. AgatePage

    AgatePage Active Member

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    not in my poll they won't.
     
  6. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    Does Michigan return to the poll?

    Do they have a higher standard of re-entry into the poll based on how hideous the Appy State loss was?
     
  7. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    They haven't given up a touchdown in 2 games. Maybe they'll sneak in at 25, but still have to think about it.
     
  8. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    BTW, tomas, my boy, what's your address so that I can pay up? :D
     
  9. amraeder

    amraeder Well-Known Member

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    A) I think there's a higher standard.
    2) I could be wrong, but it seems a little early for a 2-loss team in the polls.
    D) Penn State's wins over Buffalo, ND, and whoever else weren't that impressive. Maybe they weren't that good. (Fact is, though, they probably aren't bad, just can't exploit Michigan's biggest weakness, because Morelli is Morelli)
     
  10. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    Did I miss III?

    Penn State definitely is a paper tiger, and I wonder how much this loss will set them back.

    I also wonder how different it might have been been had it been Henne, not Morelli, behind Penn State's center, but whatev.
     
  11. Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    Does Florida drop after struggling against the worst coach in Division I?
     
  12. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    Re: SportsJournalists.com College Football Poll -- NEW RESULTS -- WEEK 3 -- PAGE 12

    If people are going to penalize WVU for looking less than stellar the previous two weeks, they have to penalize Florida for the same.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page