1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

FROM 2012 INTO 2013 POLITICS THREAD

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Sep 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Didn't watch it. Consensus is nothing damaged him enough to derail the confirmation.
     
  2. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Has Victoria Jackson been posting on this thread?

    http://www.mediaite.com/online/conservative-former-snl-star-victoria-jackson-deletes-white-history-month-article/
     
  3. BenPoquette

    BenPoquette Active Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Hagel was awful. He was ill-prepared and was made to look foolish numerous times and, honestly, I would be surprised if his confirmation goes through. He was that bad. Don't take my word for it, here is a link to the video if you would like to see it. Kind of long and boring, but pretty brutal at times.



    Personally, I like Hagel and think he would do a good job. However, he did not come out of this looking like a very attractive candidate.

    In other news, unemployment ticked up.
     
  4. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Ask, say, the prop 8 voters in California, just for one example.
     
  5. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    http://www.ipoaa.com/us_black_population.htm

    Well, the Premier needs to go ahead and annex D.C. so he can truly have a black state. The rest of those states you liberals don't label as white, well, that's pandering to the blacks because, well, it just isn't true. But then, libs are pretty good at conning for votes.
     
  6. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Who in his or her right mind would have hired you to write anything anywhere?
     
  7. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Someone, who, unlike your bosses, didn't judge political viewpoints.

    You, Fuckus, are a perfect fit for MSNBC.
     
  8. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    I'm referring to your baffling inability to write a coherent sentence.
     
  9. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Scott Brown will not run for Senate.

    http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/reports-scott-brown-to-pass-on-run-in?ref=fpa

    Which means he's either dirty or running for governor.
     
  10. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Apparently, Fuckus, a state is a white state only at 90 percent white to black.

    Yet all 50 states are overwhelmingly white.

    If a liberal claims a state is a black state, they're pandering to the people using a falsehood.
    They're good at pandering to minorities for votes, but little else.
     
  11. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Still not following you. I understand your last sentence, wrong as it is. I have no idea how you're getting there.
     
  12. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    It's pointless to convince you of anything. You've had way too much kool aid.

    Try this: Organize an Association of White States and watch the fallout from the left. Yet, your liberal buddies say there are such states. Talk about chasing their tails.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page