1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

FROM 2012 INTO 2013 POLITICS THREAD

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Sep 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Because Lindsay Graham is still pissed that Hagel was right and he was wrong about Iraq.
     
  2. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    And yet still had low, low prices and high, high profits.

    In addition to extracting $86 million from the State of California in food stamps and Medicaid to help supplement wages.

    To say nothing of the taxes various municipalities and counties and the state didn't collect for having 'incentivized' WalMart.

    I wonder what those numbers start to look like nationally when you add in our other minimum wage giants like McDonald's?
     
  3. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    This is the kind of science that thrived within the Axis alliance.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/02/130213173131.htm
    Red Brain, Blue Brain: Republicans and Democrats Process Risk Differently, Research Finds
     
  4. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    ]I'd hate to think that anyone would want answers on a terrorist attack on our sovereign soil. I'm sure no one wants any answers on that. Heck, only four Americans died, and if hiding and covering up helps the Obama Regime continue to make America the Great Socialist Country we all know it can be, then we should all be for it. Aye, Comrade?
     
  5. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Seems to go along with my theory that there's a higher degree of cowardliness among Republicans. Threatened by Muslims, immigrants, empowered women, anyone or group who might dare encroach on the current remarkably white and remarkably male power structure.
     
  6. You don't understand advise and consent, do you? What does Hagel have to do with Benghazi? You'd think Kerry would have been subjected to the same type of treatment.
     
  7. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Cranberry, your theory is unsupportable piffle, just like this junk science.
     
  8. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    I understand advise and consent perfectly, and when you're getting stonewalled by an administration intent on hiding the truth, you use whatever you have.
     
  9. Obstruction does not win elections.
     
  10. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    C'mon don't you think conservatives by their very nature are more risk averse? Threatened by change? Hunkered down in their Leave It to Beaver world? I do.
     
  11. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    Lot of peer-reviewed blood oxygen level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging going on back then?
     
  12. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    I think risk management is an interesting focal point for a disciplined study.
    Even though it's sort of intuitive - conservatives approach risk with more prudence than liberals.
    Age, maturity and/or increased earnings bump you farther to the right. Has nothing to do with brain wiring.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page