1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

FROM 2012 INTO 2013 POLITICS THREAD

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Sep 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Just because his name is Obama?
     
  2. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    But you'll challenge anyone who says Obama was elected by idiots. Just wonderful.
     
  3. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    Your proof of which is . . .?
     
  4. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    I certainly haven't done it in the past. Why would you predict it to be done in the future?
     
  5. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member



    The burden of proof lies with you since you made the assertion.

    What part of the TSA background check would Barack Obama not "pass"?
     
  6. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Well, then start turning on your own a little bit. When somebody writes "we'll wake you up when the time comes" and "Obama couldn't work for the TSA!" differentiate yourself.

    This thread is actually a neat little microcosm of how the GOP actually works. More than half the posts are from a couple of mooncalves on the far end of the golf course, deep in the fairway trap, trying to hack their way out with a 1978 rusted Hogan wedge. Even the beer cart girls don't see them. But everybody hears them cursing up a storm.
     
  7. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    I'm not saying you haven't. But it's the same problem the GOP has.
     
  8. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    This is a thread where it has been proposed the Obama administration has crafted sound economic policy.
    Let's not discuss sad hallucination from the other side.
     
  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    In what specific way was Spinoza (a) reductionist?
     
  10. BenPoquette

    BenPoquette Active Member

    This thread is definitely a microcosm of our political landscape...just look at how Woodward is being discussed. The Journolisters decide Woodward should be Alinskyized, and the masses follow like puppy dogs. Same thing on this thread. It's uncanny.
     
  11. Big Circus

    Big Circus Well-Known Member

    Yes, much better to accept what he said at face value, even when he contradicts himself.
     
  12. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    ♫ Hoome, home on the range ... where we're treated to Az's bad'nage ... ♫
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page