1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

FROM 2012 INTO 2013 POLITICS THREAD

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Sep 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Very well.

    She may have done something illegal, and doesn't want to self-incriminate herself.

    BTW, you know who else in the past has exercised his constitutional rights? Ken Lay.
     
  2. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    So, to review: The current administration has absolutely no regard for the First and Second Amendments but clings tightly to the Fifth Amendment.
     
  3. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    And the previous guy wanted to get rid of the First and Fourth.

    http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/03/03/36536/yoo-first-amendment/

    BTW, how are those Free Speech Zones working out for ya?
     
  4. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Name me an administration that didn't cling tightly to the 5th Amendment.

    I seem to remember a few Reagan aides doing so during Iran-Contra.

    Further, Reagan famously supported the Brady Bill in the New York Times, of all places, after his presidency.

    There isn't a single previous GOP president, ever, anywhere, who'd pass your litmus tests, I suspect. For one thing, they're clearly not angry enough for you. You seem to require rage in a political candidate.
     
  5. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    To the extent that Bush lied, it wasn't precisely about the presence of WMD -- North Korea and Iran quite clearly have those -- but that WMD presence, coupled with some uber-threatening, immediate Al-Qaida link, necessitated invasion.

    Anybody that's studied that invasion -- anybody! -- damn well knows that Al-Qaida flooded the country after the invasion. It was ripe for the taking. And in 15/20 years, when you have a nation of orphan, militant Muslims who watched American bombs kill family members, you'll know better what seeds that war planted in the ground.
     
  6. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    "Wanted to get rid"?

    Sadly for you, we're laughing AT you, not with you.
     
  7. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Rage? Not at all. But I do like for them to stand up to the idiot left.
     
  8. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Speaking of laughing at .... Says the guy who ran away from this thread for six weeks.
     
  9. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Yeah, it is obviously worth laughing at someone for spending time actually doing other things and not being chained to his computer to converse with liars who are so immature they follow professional wrestling.
     
  10. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Good Old "Cut and Run" Tony strikes again.
     
  11. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    You were chained to this thread 15 hours a day until Election Day.
    Boasting nonstop about Mitt's spectacular march to the White House.
     
  12. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    This thread was intolerable shortly after the election.
    Basically an Ewok celebration.
    There's no fun in that.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page