1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

FROM 2012 INTO 2013 POLITICS THREAD

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Sep 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    He raised his right hand and put his left on the bible. The audacity of him.
     
  2. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Only several years after Obama predicted it would. Congratulations!
     
  3. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Mike Huckabee: Voting Obama might send you to Hell

    http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/10/30/ex-preacher-mike-huckabee-threatens-people-with-damnation-for-voting-for-obama-video/
     
  4. sportbook

    sportbook Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    He gets the daily security briefings. Why wouldn't FEMA brief him?
     
  5. GeorgeFHayek

    GeorgeFHayek Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    A "f*#$ing idiot"? Nothing. But even before his inauguration he suggested he would pursue policies that many/most of those on the right would believe to be the province of such a person.

    President Obama came into office in the midst of an economic crisis. He also was handed a tool -- TARP -- by his Republican predecessor that was already driving Tea Party types crazy.

    President Obama then proceeded to fan those flames by attempting to take control of the commanding heights of the U.S. economy -- finance, energy and health care. Anyone of even modest economic conservatism would be put off by such an overreach. Further, his underlings made no secret that they were exploiting the economic climate to enact policies they'd have a hard time enacting in normal circumstances; "[y]ou never want a serious crisis to go to waste," said chief of staff Rahm Emanuel.

    I'm not here to attack President Obama's agenda or performance. Rather, I'm simply criticizing the idea that pops up all too frequently that Republicans (Tea Party leaning or no) opposed the President simply because he was Barack Hussein Obama rather than John W. Whitebread. Even if that were the case, President Obama certainly made it easy for such opposition to make it a matter of principle.
     
  6. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD


    Given the polls -- and in stark contrast with all the certainty expressed a year ago -- the GOP ain't winning the Senate.

    Note to GOP: thanks for nominating a double-handful of epic morons.
     
  7. GeorgeFHayek

    GeorgeFHayek Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    One thing I am going to scream loud and long about is this idea of a "split decision" (e.g., one candidate wins the popular vote, the other wins the Electoral College). That ain't a split decision, because there isn't a true popular-vote race going on here. There's the veneer of a popular-vote race, but both campaigns would have vastly different strategies if that's how the election was to be decided. We can't know how the votes would have fallen in a true popular-vote election.

    Also, I agree/disagree with B_H ... the Senate's going to be controlled by the Dems ... probably 53-/54-vote majority. So one (maybe two) asshat candidates on the GOP side aren't solely to blame.
     
  8. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    A thousand times yes.

    There was nothing to bitch about in 2000 and there would be nothing to bitch about now.
     
  9. Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD


    When did you stop touching little boys?
     
  10. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Given the libertarian bent of a number of folks on the board, I wonder how come Gary Johnson doesn't come up more often (at all?) in the discussion. He's a two-time governor with some business credentials. Too much of a kook? It's not so easy to make the case; in fact, I can certainly see where he might appeal to some who have very different ideas about government's role than me.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/10/19/gary-johnsons-third-party-presidential-bid-a-real-factor-or-just-a-footnote/

     
  11. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    So they were not only patriotic, they have extrasensory abilities. You should trust them even more.
     
  12. Big Circus

    Big Circus Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Virgil Goode weeps.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page