1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

FROM 2012 INTO 2013 POLITICS THREAD

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Sep 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 535 of 1781
  1. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    FoxNews.com right now is just a User's Guide To The Rage.

    Voter Fraud Monitors on High Alert on Election Day
    SWING TO MITT: Newspapers Leave Obama for Romney
    Allegations of Unions Putting Illegal Immigrants on Voter Rolls in Nevada
    NOT POPULAR: Ditch Electoral College?
    Thousands of Troops May Not Get to Vote, Senators Say
    Group Home Accused of Taking Patients to Vote for Obama
     
    LongTimeListener, Nov 5, 2012
    #6409
  2. amraeder

    amraeder Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    That was great!
     
    amraeder, Nov 5, 2012
    #6410
  3. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Citation needed.
     
    RickStain, Nov 5, 2012
    #6411
  4. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Imply is a loose enough word to leave TSP on the right side of the truth. There was that billionaire time share owner, for one. I'm pretty sure the Kochs "implied" something similar.
     
    Uncle.Ruckus, Nov 5, 2012
    #6412
  5. YGBFKM

    YGBFKM Guest

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    It's Barack Obama vs. Mitt Romney. This is like a Jaguars-Browns Super Bowl. I hope the presidency will be special again someday soon.
     
    YGBFKM, Nov 5, 2012
    #6413
  6. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    They implied that their employees would be laid off if Obama won.

    That's plenty skeevy, but it's not implying that they'll be fired if they *vote* for the wrong candidate.
     
    RickStain, Nov 5, 2012
    #6414
  7. TowelWaver

    TowelWaver Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Apparently a tweak to Nate's numbers was required. Both the prediction and now cast are identical now, at 92.2%.
     
    TowelWaver, Nov 5, 2012
    #6415
  8. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Now we're talking semantics. Either way, the result is the same.
     
    Uncle.Ruckus, Nov 5, 2012
    #6416
  9. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    I liked this one too.

    https://twitter.com/CoryBooker/status/264022914922323969
     
    Inky_Wretch, Nov 5, 2012
    #6417
  10. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty New Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    and i still want to buy you that hoodie ... even if you are voting for the wrong cat. ; P
     
    Tom Petty, Nov 5, 2012
    #6418
  11. 3OctaveFart

    3OctaveFart Guest

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Maybe you two should get a room.
     
    3OctaveFart, Nov 5, 2012
    #6419
  12. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    It's really not. One implies a whole other level of invasion of privacy and creepiness.
     
    RickStain, Nov 5, 2012
    #6420
Page 535 of 1781
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page