1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ganim / Patriot-News Win Pulitzer for Sandusky / PSU Coverage

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Azrael, Apr 16, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    Calling her hot is demeaning and also not true in my opinion. But then again, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
     
  2. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    A loss for the readers of Pennsylvania, because this story has a lot more unfolding to do. Congratulations to a damn good journalist.
     
  3. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    I would say it's more demeaning to say it's not true, but you're the manners expert around here.
     
  4. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    It's not about manners smart guy.
     
  5. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

    Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Or is moron in the blood of the guy with a shit box ring? We'll discuss that and more next on THE SITUATION ROOM with Wolf Blitzer and Sara Ganim.
     
  6. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    Good for her. If some of her investigative and reporting talents can translate to TV, it will make CNN a stronger operation.
     
  7. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    Man, I don't even know how to respond to that. How about explaining it Double Down since you took so much effort to post it.
     
  8. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    Excellent point Wicked. It will be interesting to see if the PN can continue doing its stellar work at such a high level.
     
  9. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    I'd say I'm amazed that this conversation dipped to its recent level ...

    But I'm not.
     
  10. rde

    rde New Member

    Unless she's making north of $200,000 at CNN (which I would doubt), that is not true, based on NYT scale.
     
  11. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

    If she's actually ON television instead of just working for CNN.com and she's not making close to $200,000, then she needs a better agent.
     
  12. rde

    rde New Member

    Well, I mean...TV newcomer...not an ex-athlete...not nearly as widely known as we'd like to imagine. And she's not an anchor, she's a correspondent. TV networks can't afford to pay everyone $300,000 or whatever.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page