George Will on global warming

And it's really hard to take you seriously when you can't even get a handle on basic English.

Cannot is one word, cockboy.

 

Ho-hum
Muller's an astronomer, not a climatologist.
That piece is not peer-reviewed.
Other problems:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=11#falseclaims

 

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/2/14/151325.shtml?s=lh
More evidence that any very small global warming is caused by natural factors and is well with in the natural course of the earths warming and cooling periods.

A small Quote from the article.

As for that dreaded greenhouse gas, CO2, atmospheric levels of which now exceed 400 parts per million (ppm), it is important to note that paleological records show that every time CO2 levels have exceeded 300 ppm there has been an ice age. Every time — without exception.

 

Phil Brennan is a joke. In another piece he quotes the equally fraudulent Canadian academic Timothy Ball.

Love this "editor's note" at the end of the article.

Read more about how Al Gore and his friends spin and fib about global warming

Fib?

Children, get in line. Recess is over.

 

Just as when you were a child it is time to sit down and have a little lecture.
http://media.entrewave.com/view/oism/lecture/viewer/lectureplayer.htm

 

Would you like to buy a comma, Cockboy?

 

Idiotsnetwork, find some genuine, peer-reviewed articles supporting your view. Otherwise, you're just another JV player who can't keep up with the varsity.

Asshat.

 

Glad to see you are back to you reasonable ways. I was afraid you had changed. LOL. When in doubt start an irrational fight.

 

Glad to see you to back to your customary idiocy. Of course, you'll never change. When in doubt, steal stuff from the Internet.

 

Here is your unfortunate truth about peer review.
http://www.sunyaprajna.com/Worldview/GlobalWarming.html

 

And anyone whose "scientific paper" has the phrase "I am a priori skeptical " in the first sentence is doomed to ridicule.

Oh, and the author is listed as "Benjamin aka Ben". Is that like "Richard aka Rick"?

And like OT, he quotes Lindzen and Ball as two of his sources. Neither has credibility in the scientific community

Go away

 

How about peer reviewed Global Cooling.
http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/01/peer-reviewed-global-cooling.html