1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Great Eclipse of 2017

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by MileHigh, Jul 22, 2017.

  1. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    Here's a fun game:

    Is this a 2024 path of totality or a 1976 Kiss tour?
     
    Batman likes this.
  2. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    2024 should be an extravaganza to dwarf this year, with mid-game observances at 5-6 MLB Opening Day games.
     
  3. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    Somebody will be winning an award for that one.
    Very well done.
     
    ChrisLong likes this.
  4. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    They got it right, didn't they?
     
  5. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Better had Chicago been in the path of totality. Perhaps the same concept and do it at what the max was in Chicago.
     
  6. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Hmmm . . . .

    The eclipse is mighty big in that image, which suggests a telescope.

    But the climber in the foreground obviously was shot with a regular camera (although zoomed somewhat, perhaps).

    The size of the two things just doesn't make sense. What am I missing?
     
  7. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    The Greeks were predicting them with incredible precision 3,000+ years ago.
     
    poindexter likes this.
  8. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    Long lens, probably 600mm, shot from a distance. Think of it like this: The sun is so large and so far away, that no matter where on Earth I take a shot of it, it will appear a certain size when photographed at 600mm, probably nearly filling the frame. If I shoot it at 85mm, it will always appear to be a dot in the frame. So the "trick," if you can call it that, is the distance you stand from your subject. The further away you stand and the more you zoom in, the larger the sun will appear relative to the subject.

    If I shoot a portrait of a person using an 85mm lens from 10 feet away, they'll take up probably 2/3 of the frame and the sun will be a dot in the distance. If I step back 300 feet and zoom in with a 600mm lens until the person again takes up 2/3 of the frame, the sun will, as always, fill a significant portion of the frame and look relatively huge next to the person.
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2017
  9. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    poindexter and YankeeFan like this.
  10. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    BTExpress and YankeeFan like this.
  11. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Looks like the cover of David Bowie or Pink Floyd album.
    "Dark Side of the Eclipse"?
     
    bigpern23 likes this.
  12. UPChip

    UPChip Well-Known Member

    I was wondering if anyone followed up to see if anyone did the Carly Simon.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page