1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If the presidential election were held today, who would you vote for?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Mizzougrad96, Sep 29, 2011.

?

If the presidential election were held today, who would you vote for?

  1. Barack Obama

    72 vote(s)
    56.7%
  2. Chris Christie

    8 vote(s)
    6.3%
  3. Rick Perry

    5 vote(s)
    3.9%
  4. Mitt Romney

    8 vote(s)
    6.3%
  5. Michele Bachmann

    2 vote(s)
    1.6%
  6. Herman Cain

    10 vote(s)
    7.9%
  7. Ron Paul

    4 vote(s)
    3.1%
  8. Rick Santorum

    1 vote(s)
    0.8%
  9. Jon Huntsman

    10 vote(s)
    7.9%
  10. Sarah Palin

    3 vote(s)
    2.4%
  11. Newt Gingrich

    2 vote(s)
    1.6%
  12. Ralph Nader

    1 vote(s)
    0.8%
  13. Gary Johnson

    1 vote(s)
    0.8%
  1. BrianGriffin

    BrianGriffin Active Member

    You are correct. Unless 9-9-9 is going to fund the states too, it won't work. And if it does fund the states, it'll do serious harm to states' rights, given that it undercuts a state's ability to support itself.
     
  2. CarltonBanks

    CarltonBanks New Member

    I agree with this and have yet to hear or read about one single legitimate economist that has studied it and said the 9-9-9 plan would be anything but a fiasco. Raising the tax burden on the poor aside, it would not raise enough revenue from what I have read. Unless the fed govt is going to go on a starvation diet and we are going to stop protecting ourselves with a well-equipped military.
     
  3. printdust

    printdust New Member

    Jackassery response.
     
  4. Stitch

    Stitch Active Member

    Herman Cain should get a refund for his college degree, since math is not his strong suit.

    http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/13/8304334-cains-9-9-9-tax-plan-is-simple-youll-simply-pay-more
     
  5. printdust

    printdust New Member

    Maybe the rest of Washington should since the budget is in the shape it's in.
     
  6. Point of Order

    Point of Order Active Member

    Today, The Rent Is Too Damn High Guy

     
  7. SpeedTchr

    SpeedTchr Well-Known Member

    "NYU law professor Daniel Shaviro thinks part of the popular appeal of Cain’s plan is that it appears to hold tax rates to single digits – even though the cumulative tax paid by most households would amount to 27 percent. Borrowing from Cain, Shaviro offers and even simpler solution to make existing tax code much more palatable

    “Replace the 35 percent annual income tax with a 3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3 monthly tax on annual income,” he recently wrote on his blog. “After all, who's counting if the 12 monthly taxes actually add up to 36 percent annually?”

    Huh? Where did lawboy get that 27% number from for "most households"?
     
  8. FileNotFound

    FileNotFound Well-Known Member

    On one hand, I give Cain credit for presenting a plan, something that other candidates haven't really offered. On the other hand, it's a stupid plan, and it doesn't take a math whiz to see that.
     
  9. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Maybe he just added up the three 9s.
     
  10. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Does Mr. Cain know that '9-9-9' is the emergency services number in Europe?
     
  11. SpeedTchr

    SpeedTchr Well-Known Member

    Which would indicate that lawboy thinks most households are businesses. One of those 9s is the business tax rate.
     
  12. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    In Herman Cain's apocalyptic America, every household will be a business.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page