1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Indiana Gov. signs "religious freedom" bill into law

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by SnarkShark, Mar 26, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mr. Sunshine

    Mr. Sunshine Well-Known Member

    Like every thread, this one needs more Baron.
     
    JC and JackReacher like this.
  2. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Saying that people who attend the ceremony aren't "in" the ceremony is not entirely correct. In many, many circumstances attendees are considered just as much a part of the ceremony as the bride and groom.
     
  3. Mr. Sunshine

    Mr. Sunshine Well-Known Member

  4. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    What if it's a press conference or photo op, then?
     
  5. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    The idea that your private property (or your "industry" in the old-fashioned usage of that term) isn't yours to do with as you see fit (when such use causes no other person any harm) really, really, really, really, really bugs me.
     
  6. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    JC posting under your name again?
     
    JC likes this.
  7. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    You didn't build that.
     
    old_tony likes this.
  8. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    LOL ... Far too obvious a play for me (although it certainly crossed my mind).
     
    old_tony likes this.
  9. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Well, most of them can and do. I know several. They've just never been asked. Most of them will not be asked. Of those who were, they might decline, and the gay couple in question may not have an issue with it. Gay couples are not generally on the hunt for public fights.

    And all of them live in America, which is more or less the best country in the history of the world a Christian could ever live in. Most of them are pretty wealthy and comfortable. Several overcharge for their services because, God bless them, a lot of Christians have a habit of doing that. I wouldn't hire a one of them for anything, I love them, some of my friends, but as far as their religious freedom being limited in a way that'd give them a true moment's pause - not the political, Facebook-fueled pause, but the existential, where-is-God-on-this pause - I'm not sure many have experienced it.
     
  10. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Yeah, honestly, the "religious" nature of their objection doesn't really concern me.

    I realize that the law that passed was based on religious rights/objections, but I don't think the objection should be required to be rooted in religion.

    I think you should be able to turn down a job for any reason you want -- even spite!

    If attending a gay wedding makes you uncomfortable in a way that attending a Wicca wedding doesn't, I think that should be your prerogative -- even if I disagree with the decision.
     
  11. JayFarrar

    JayFarrar Well-Known Member

    Invited guests and wedding crashers, particularly Owen Wilson, are part of the ceremony.

    The hired help is not.
     
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I'm with you.

    You know what really, really, really, really bugs me, too? When people "see fit" to discriminate against others because their sexuality is different. Does that really, really, really, really, really bug you, as well?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page