It's a peace loving religion, 'cept for the 5,000 women killed annually

Daddy, this is off-topic. but this is some first-class binge-posting you've got going rignt now.

 

Fucking up at 4 a.m. ... never got em shut again.

I hear ya.

I'll be crashing soon.

 

Thanks for playing

 

I'm just curious ... when people killed Matthew Shepherd because he was gay, did you speak out against them? When Fred Phelps protests at military funerals, do you speak out against radical fundamentalist Christians like him? When people kill others in the name of God ... and believe me it does happen ... do you speak out against those alleged Christians.

Don't demand someone do something you can't or won't do yourself.

 

You know, I read a lot of your posts, something about enjoying the feeling of nausea, but I'd rather be on my side than yours, and it's reaffirmed EVERY time you utter something. You have no direction, only to attack others.

Again, I really think you should relocate there. You seem so sympathetic, you'd be perfect. I could even see you burn an American flag. And kidnap any non-flaming liberal? You'd be at the center of the team. You'd found your own heaven.

I'll donate to your ticket.

 

Oh my God. So we're going to say you have to be supportive of the gay agenda or you can't touch radical Islamic bastards? That's the impllication. You can't possibly be so stupid to think that ANY isolated murder requires taking to the streets in a similar response to a collective attack on the country. Or can you? I think it's an aim at the former position than the latter.

I wish all of you likeminded pussies would get the hell out of this country. You offer NOTHING except paralysis. With so little substance, we'd still be paying homage to the king of England.

Actually, just stay put. You aren't really relevant to the powers that be.

 

You're kidding, right? You actually put into print a demand of Chuck Taylor that he "speak with fervor against your brothers" because it's something YOU believe he should do, but you don't feel others should be held to that same standard. If you impose standards on people, you have to live by them yourself, too.

And I've contributed nothing of substance to this country? My nine years and three war zones service in the military would beg to differ.

 

Well, I had hopes for Dammit, but he's gone jackass in a big way in his last two posts.
The "gay agenda."
"Likeminded pussies."
Etc.
I stay in this country because it needs those of us who remember what its true value in the world has been, and it wasn't a bubbling vat of chickenhawk testosterone.

 

Actually, the Loyalists (or Tories) were more likely to be conservative. Your revolutionists tended to be liberal.

So why don't you put on your powdered wig and let the panty waists handled the tough stuff.

 

Attack others? I thought I was sort of defending Chuck, not that he couldn't handle that on his own given who he's up against here.

What I did was take your ignorant, simple-minded view of a large group of people and called it what it is -- racist. If you don't like being described that way, I suggest you change, because the definition of racist isn't going to. And right now, you and a couple others here are making a strong run at being the racism poster boys.

And by the way, we do love macho posturing. Please keep it up. It's an excellent indication of the level of maturity and intellect we're dealing with. Through just 400 posts, you've managed to move yourself to just slightly above the level of the average chimp in both categories. At this rate, you'll reach pond scum in less than a 1,000 posts. Shoot for the stars.

 

And your thinking, Dog, certainly isn't going to improve. Oh - wait - liberalism means embracing every new wind that blows from the cultural elitists. As they go, you go. Which really means you haven't the capacity to think for yourself and to be grounded in anything.

 

"Cultural elitists"
A plea for independent thought from a walking buzzphrase.
Ah, no.