1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

It's that time of year: College coach carousel!

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Killick, Mar 7, 2011.

  1. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    I'm stupid. I need help from someone as smart as you.

    You take the time to research my posts, but not the five seconds to cut and paste a staement. I am so sorry to waste your time. It must be much more valuable than mine.

    I'll stop responding to your posts.

    Or maybe the exact text is not there.
     
  2. MartinonMTV2

    MartinonMTV2 New Member

    Oh, it's there.

    Found it: http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/posts/3017433/

    I'll help you even more:
    Now, answer the question. You've dodged it for half a day in two different threads.
     
  3. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    You have a problem with me saying VCU had the three best players on the floor when they played Purdue?

    They did. The rest of the tourney proved that Skeen, Rodriguez and Burgess were better than the players Purdue had on the floor.

    Are you hung up that Skeen, Rodriguez and Burgess were not blue chip recruits? Well Skeen was a four star recruit (http://wakeforestsports.cstv.com/sports/m-baskbl/mtt/skeen_jamie00.html), Rodriguez was a three star recruit and Burgess was a two star recruit.

    Even though Skeen was a four star recruit, that does not make him a blue chipper. Those are five star players.

    Look at any year (http://rivals.yahoo.com/basketballrecruiting/basketball/recruiting/rankings/rank-rivals150/2007) and you can see the blue chips are always blue chips.

    What exact question do you want me to answer?
     
  4. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    Luckily a lot of Missouri fans are also Kansas City Royals fans, so they're used to let downs.
     
  5. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Yeah, awful hire. The only good thing that could come out of it for Missouri will be if Frank Martin leaves to fill the opening at Miami.
     
  6. doubledown68

    doubledown68 Active Member

    Completely fucking ridiculous. Opting for Quin Snyder over Bill Self was a mistake, and we know that now. But Snyder was perhaps the hottest commodity in college basketball at the time.

    Mike Anderson was a fantastic hire... especially in the wake of the hot mess Snyder left behind. And Alden still damn near got fired on the day Anderson was introduced.

    Hiring Frank fucking Haith is a fireable offense. Complete fucking joke.
     
  7. Mystery Meat II

    Mystery Meat II Well-Known Member

    Is Haith really that bad a hire? As pointed out, getting anything out of Miami is pretty impressive these days. They're the worst basketball school in the ACC, but Haith at least kept them competitive when it would have been very easy for them to fall to Wake Forest levels. Sometimes treading water in a storm surge is more impressive than being Michael Phelps in a wading pool.
     
  8. Big Circus

    Big Circus Well-Known Member

    I think they could have done a lot worse. Painter would have been better, but Haith has had some middling success in a program with zero support and zero tradition.

    On another note, what happened to all the black coaches in the ACC? Just two years ago, more than half the league's coaches were black. That's Haith, Lowe, Hewitt, Leitao, Purnell and Skinner gone in that time. Leonard Hamilton had better watch his back.
     
  9. BrianGriffin

    BrianGriffin Active Member

    Maybe he'll be the Gene Chizik of basketball. In other words, Missouri will be on probation in three years...
     
  10. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    But with a national title? :D
     
  11. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Looks like Shaka to NC State is almost a done deal. $12 million for six years? I'm glad Missouri didn't pay that, although who the hell knows what they paid for the clown it just hired. :D

    http://www.accsports.com/blogs/david-glenn/2011040410199/nc-state-update-shaka-smart-answer-coming-soon.php
     
  12. Hate-Miser2

    Hate-Miser2 Member

    From reading stuff online, it sounds like there's about to be riots in Columbia over this hire (OK, a little overdramatic, but still).

    Haith may have had middling success at Miami, but there's no way in the world that the case can be made that this is the best coach they could attract to Columbia. He may not be in the top 30 candidates, once you start with the qualified mid-major coaches, assistants at top BCS-conference schools, retreads who are looking for jobs and coaches at other solid D-I programs who may be looking for a change of scenery.

    I think it's clear that the Missouri AD was denied by Painter and Tubby Smith (that we know of), and he was not going to take the chance of having another coach tell him no and this hire being labeled as his No. 4 choice.

    I see where the Board of Governors is meeting today to approve the contract. Is there a chance they don't approve it? That may placate the fan base, but they would basically have to fire the AD after that, and I can't imagine any other coach willing to even talk to Mizzou about the job, knowing they could get denied at the last minute and have to go crawling back to their old job.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page