1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

It's time to give it Vick one and for all

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by boots, Apr 28, 2007.

Page 3 of 4
  1. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Joy Behar suggested it.

    She's just as nice in person.
     
    zeke12, Apr 28, 2007
    #25
  2. pallister

    pallister Guest

    If Vick had better receivers, this would NOT have happened.
     
    pallister, Apr 28, 2007
    #26
  3. boots

    boots New Member

    Naw... he would've found a way to stay in the headlines. I think he likes it.
     
    boots, Apr 28, 2007
    #27
  4. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Are you saying he's an attention whore?
     
    zeke12, Apr 28, 2007
    #28
  5. boots

    boots New Member

    Michael Vick loves attention.
     
    boots, Apr 28, 2007
    #29
  6. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Fairly easy to smell your own, eh?

    Might make a good segment. Call Barbara.
     
    zeke12, Apr 28, 2007
    #30
  7. boots

    boots New Member

    Call her at 212-456-5100.
     
    boots, Apr 28, 2007
    #31
  8. HoopsMcCann

    HoopsMcCann Active Member

    please stick to the topic
     
    HoopsMcCann, Apr 28, 2007
    #32
  9. Write-brained

    Write-brained Guest

    Yeah we're talking about "give it to Vick one and for all" ... and all for one?
     
    Write-brained, Apr 28, 2007
    #33
  10. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    You seem to have made a mistake.

    It's "give it vick one and for all".

    It was done for effect.
     
    zeke12, Apr 28, 2007
    #34
  11. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    We don't understand. Was the thread title cromulent or not?
     
    Chi City 81, Apr 28, 2007
    #35
  12. Write-brained

    Write-brained Guest

    oops, stupid me, you're right .. by adding the word 'it' 'to' I almost ruined the apparent intended effect of it not making sense
     
    Write-brained, Apr 28, 2007
    #36
Page 3 of 4
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page