1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jay Mariotti resigns

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by BB Bobcat, Aug 26, 2008.

  1. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    "It's been a tremendous experience, but I'm going to be honest with you, the profession is dying,'' Mariotti said, "I don't think either paper [Sun-Times or Chicago Tribune] is going to survive.

    Yet after saying that, he immediately was in negotiations with the Trib.

    You think that word didn't reach the ST offices? I'd lay money some (not all) of the blasting of Mariotti by the ST was because they knew he was a duplicitous asshole who couldn't even tell the truth on the way out the door.
     
  2. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    He deserves all the shit he gets -- from readers, here and management. You're right, Mizzou, that no employee should get from the S-T what Marriotti did. OTOH, no paper and no co-worker should take the public shit that Mariotti gave out...
     
  3. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Show me another example of a paper humiliating a writer like that after they leave.

    I don't even think the NY Post has ever stooped that low.

    I'm sure Mariotti was a colossal pain in the ass. But he did his job and brought a lot of readers to that paper and under no circumstances did he deserve the humiliation that the S-T dumped on him.
     
  4. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    Show me another writer who publicly humiliated his co-workers the way Mariotti did.
     
  5. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Unfortunately, feuding columnists, even publuicly or in print, is not at all uncommon. What Mariotti did to the beat writer earlier this year cannot be defended, but there is no person in this business who has ever merited the treatment that the S-T gave Mariotti after he quit.
     
  6. Dickens Cider

    Dickens Cider New Member

    First time for everything.
     
  7. Joe Williams

    Joe Williams Well-Known Member

    Well, now, let's not overstate this. Jayson Blair earned his company's and his profession's full wrath.

    But your point is well-taken. And the NYT never got as cheap and sleazy in its handling of Blair's ouster as the Sun-Times did with Mariotti's departure -- a guy who did produce much content and chatter, at least, while never veering into Blair-like (or even Albom-like) fabrications.

    Mariotti spouting off like a jerk as he left meant the jerk was leaving the building. The Sun-Times personnel reveling and wallowing in it meant that those jerks still were staying in the building. Bad message to send to skeptical readership and shaky customer base.
     
  8. SockPuppet

    SockPuppet Active Member

    It takes a prick to defend a prick.
     
  9. Joe Williams

    Joe Williams Well-Known Member

    The whole sordid mess makes the Chicago Tribune, with its instant interest in hiring Mariotti, look stupider than any of them.

    It's like some loser looking at Amy Winehouse or Britney Spears or the Whitney Houston marriage and saying, "Oh yeah. She's for me!"
     
  10. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I wasn't defending Mariotti. I was condemning the Sun-Times for acting so childish.

    The Sun-Times has been one of my favorite papers for decades. I expected more from them.
     
  11. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    Hey, you can't talk about my fiancee like that!
     
  12. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page