Jeff Pearlman: SJ.com is for loosers!!11!!11!!

Since we're all into the voice thing here ...

I think the Padres should get their fans to chant this every time Solarte steps up to the plate ...

 

I absolutely knew that was going to be the tune before I pressed "play."

 

Been working on that for a week.

 

The golden era was great...it got a little intense at times, too. The needling got turned up to an 11, and, more than once, there were folks who probably needed, you know, professional help, who didn't take some of that stuff very well. It got a little too personal.

I missed whole chunks of the Dark Ages/Civil War, obviously I did, because I don't recall it with the same level of intensity.

The status quo is decent. It's a little anti-journalism for my taste, but not too much.

 

Pretty hard to blame people for being anti-print here. Too many walking dead for it to be any other way.

 

I mean anti-journalism. Not the industry. The practice of it. There's a lack of grace for it from some around here.

 

Ahhh, yes, you are right about that.

 

#Journalism

Emily Ratajkowski shows off her bum

Sexiest Woman Alive 2017 - Esquire's SWA of the Year - Esquire

 

An SJ.com Old Timers Day has possibilities. I'd chip in a few bucks for that pay per view.

 

Is there someone arguing this is journalism, or are you arguing with yourself?

 

Wonders what the heck you're trying to suggest....

 

I would love to hear more about this!