1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jones gives good blog?

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Uncle.Ruckus, Mar 29, 2012.

  1. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    I preferred LL's beef with Canibus.
     
  2. Zeke12

    Zeke12 Guest

    I liked "bannermen".

    "My name is Double, House of Down, the first of my name, ruler of the Wire threads, warden of the O'Brien discussions, Hand of the King and protector of the realm."
     
  3. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Does this mean DD will soon have his own meme, a la Stupid Ned Stark?
     
  4. Zeke12

    Zeke12 Guest

    No, DD, don't walk into that vacant with Whitlock!
     
  5. Lugnuts

    Lugnuts Well-Known Member

    I get that. And again-- I would have had a ball taking him down with all the same jocularity of that blog post.

    But I can't argue this one on the merits. Oh how I wish I could! Gawker's taken all of the fun out of it for me.
     
  6. Headless_Roland

    Headless_Roland New Member

    You keep saying this thing about the clicks. So I looked it up.

    http://www.niemanlab.org/2012/03/i-cant-stop-reading-this-analysis-of-gawkers-editorial-strategy/

    "While that writer struggles to find dancing cat videos and Burger King bathroom fights or any other post they feel will add those precious, precious new eyeballs, the rest of the staff will spend time on more substantive stories they may have neglected due to the rigors of scouring the internet each day to hit some imaginary quota."

    I think you're missing the point of the clickbaiting, Big Ragu. It's to give the other writers time and space to work on the substantive stories. I have no idea if it's worked out that way. (I float over to the site maybe 2-3 times a week; it certainly does feel like they're running bigger, meatier stories, but that's just an impression.) I do know that Gawker is smart enough to realize that relying entirely on dumb clickbait and wild untruths will kill whatever editorial advantage they have over sites like Buzzfeed and Huffington Post. They're cynical as shit over there, but they're not stupid. If the site really were the wasteland you describe, Ragu, I'd never read it.
     
  7. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    If the site really were the wasteland you describe, Ragu, I'd never read it.
    Fallacy of authority, I guess. Maybe Zeke would know better what fallacy that precisely is.

    Anyhoo, implying that Gawker has any edge over Huffpost is a giggle-inducer.
     
  8. Zeke12

    Zeke12 Guest

    Circular logic, too.
     
  9. Headless_Roland

    Headless_Roland New Member

    Let me rephrase. I do not believe the site is the wasteland that Big Ragu describes.

    Maybe I'm not up on my Huffpo, but last I looked, it was aggregation + celebrity op-eds, with a little Sam Stein thrown in. If there's ever been a decent turn of phrase committed to print over there, I haven't read it.
     
  10. Zeke12

    Zeke12 Guest

    Without me even looking, which are the in-depth pieces of journalism on Gawker's front page right now?

    The ones they were busy writing while this dillweed was writing about Jones' wife.

    Perhaps they're in Mombassa, in a barrom drinking gin?
     
  11. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Gawker is full of SCOOPS!
     
  12. 21

    21 Well-Known Member

    @Bubbler, the album with 'I Need Love' also has a song called 'The Boomin System.' I think we'll play a little LL for Passover next weekend, thanks!

    Back to the thread. May I just be blunt and suggest that when a woman is clamping her legs together, for any reason, it's a good sign you just shouldn't be there. I'm sorry, but I think that needed to be addressed.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page