1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mass casualty shooting in Orlando nightclub

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Vombatus, Jun 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    The people should have the right to bear arms so as to participate as members of a well regulated militia. It seems clear to me. It also seems as a matter of practice that those who used 'arms' to hunt and protect themselves to survive are entitled to possess rifles and handguns.

    But tell me that Wyatt Earp is a sissy lefty for banning firearms in Tombstone when the shootings got out of hand
     
  2. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Barnie breaks with liberals, as Islamists target the LGBT community.

    But, you know why we can't have "significant surveillance" of people identified by the FBI to have radical beliefs?

    Because there are too many of them!

     
  3. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    What political courage, attaching it to a DO A bill
     
  4. Fly

    Fly Well-Known Member

    I love ya MC, but this statement is patently false.
     
  5. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  6. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

  7. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    So he's essentially the dad from "American Beauty."
     
    Smallpotatoes likes this.
  8. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    That's not what I'm getting at at all. The Constitution endows Congress with the power to call forth militias (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15). Given that, if the 2nd was intended to provide only for an individual's right to bear arms as a member of a militia, there was no reason for it. By that I mean that without it Congress was free to expand/limit/eliminate citizens' arms-bearing in any manner it saw fit ... and with it (under the "only in a militia" interpretation) Congress was similarly free.
     
  9. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    So now he's a closeted Muslim terrorist!?!
     
  10. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    State Militias
     
  11. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    They don't restrict the sale of drugs with pseudoephedrine?
     
    Fly likes this.
  12. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Same deal ... Congress had the power to step in and take control of state militias.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page