1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mellencamp blames Petty (for turning him into a whore)

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by ifilus, Jan 23, 2007.

  1. Columbo

    Columbo Active Member

    Also... it was a cutting edge product that is cool to be associated with.
     
  2. Lamar Mundane

    Lamar Mundane Member

    this is sad, both are great American storytellers. While I still view commercialization as selling out, the way the music industry is now I respect them for finding ways to get their music out.

    When you begin writing songs for commercials then it's really selling out.

    I just hope this doesn't escalate into a Biggie/Tupac rivalry.

    Send in Willie Nelson to mediate.
     
  3. Pretty much. Pete Townshend was ripped for letting car companies use "Baba O'Riley" and "Won't Get Fooled Again" 35 years after The Who Sell Out, which had songs about Jaguars, Coke, and Heinz Baked Beans.
     
  4. EStreetJoe

    EStreetJoe Well-Known Member

    It's one thing when an artist lets one of his commercials get used in one of his songs. It's something else when an artist like Mellencamp, who throughout his career hasn't wanted his songs being used for commercial purposes, turns around and allows one of his songs to be used in a commercial and then instead of simply saying "they made me an offer I couldn't refuse" he tries blaming the music industry citing Tom Petty as an example.
     
  5. Freelance Hack

    Freelance Hack Active Member

    As much as I cringe hearing Mellencamp croon on a Chevy commercial, I cringe just as much when I see a CD I like featured in Starbucks.

    I go there to get a drink, not to find out which musician I need to listen to.

    BTW, Mitch Albom's book also is available for purchase at your nearby Starbucks.
     
  6. daveevansedge

    daveevansedge Member

    And in addition, on the aforementioned U2 note, it was for a product used to legally download music. For a good chunk of the past decade, many of us got a ton of MP3s for free. U2 not only wanted to promote its product, but continue to get the earnings that should come from what they've produced. Totally understandable.
    And they weren't paid for the promos, either. They allowed "Vertigo" and "Original of the Species" to be used knowing it would push their product and Apple's Ipod. Savvy move.
     
  7. I think there's some confusion here - I don't think he meant he was following Petty's lead. I don't think Petty let any of his songs be used for a commercial, as some here seem to think.

    I believe that he meant he didn't want his songs to suffer the same fate as the ones on "Highway Companion" i.e. no airplay.
     
  8. shockey

    shockey Active Member

    absolutely. mellencamp was COMPLIMENTING petty to help his rationalization.
     
  9. Frank_Ridgeway

    Frank_Ridgeway Well-Known Member

    Mellencamp on Kimmel tonight.
     
  10. EStreetJoe

    EStreetJoe Well-Known Member

    He was complementing Petty and ripping the industry (for not giving Petty more airplay or publicity) at the same time. He was using Petty as an example of what the industry has become and how it treats its veteran artists.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page