1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mitchell Report Thread (Nothing to see here! Drugs are bad. Crisis averted!)

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Double Down, Dec 12, 2007.

  1. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (We're at go time!)

    Why doesn't ESPN.com SportsNation crib some of our comments? We're much more interesting!
     
  2. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (We're at go time!)

    And stunningly, I didn't see Dennis Martinez. I thought for sure he would be in there somewhere.
     
  3. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (List of players in report on pg. 17)

    Yeah boy this sure makes Clemens' rageful bat-throwing incident a lot more interesting doesn't it?

    Christ. Blinders. Everyone had blinders.
     
  4. thebiglead

    thebiglead Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (We're at go time!)

    Which is exactly why I never posted it on TBL
    :)
    Someone left it in the comments section
     
  5. bostonbred

    bostonbred Guest

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (We're at go time!)

    List was obviously underwhelming, minus a few names.

    Clemens is a fraud, atleast his post-Sox days anyway. Dan Duquette may have been correct. And if Bonds is not let in to the Hall, Clemens better not either.
     
  6. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (List of players in report on pg. 17)

    Because that doesn't help the "hit count" on their Web site ...

    Jose Cuervo is not a performance-enhancing drug ...
     
  7. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (List of players in report on pg. 17)

    Steve Phillips: "The likelihood is I had guys who were cheating [in the 2000 World Series]."

    Yeah. Game One catcher Todd Pratt.
     
  8. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (List of players in report on pg. 17)

    Clemens didn't throw the bat because of roids.

    He threw the bat because he's an asshole.

    Go fix your highlights, Roger.
     
  9. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (List of players in report on pg. 17)

    So since Barry Bonds is not on the list, does that mean he is clean in Mitchell's eyes?
     
  10. cougargirl

    cougargirl Active Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (We're at go time!)

    Lack of a paper trail can't validate much.

    Kirk Radomski and the government had some pretty solid substantial evidence - delivery slips, voided checks, even a thank-you note from Paul Lo Duca on Dodger Stadium stationary - but the question then becomes, how many guys not named in the report paid in cash?

    BTW, Santiago's in the report under BALCO.
     
  11. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (List of players in report on pg. 17)

    But, but, but ... he thought it was a moldy sandwich! monster! bottle of Slim Fast! ethics form he had to sign! ball!
     
  12. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Re: The Running Mitchell Report Thread (List of players in report on pg. 17)

    Is it OK not to give a shit?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page